Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hukum Chand Vs. Emperor

Hukum Chand vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Mar 28, 1923
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/484390

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XL V of 1860), Section 426 - Mischief--Removal of earth by tenant in exercise of bona fide right--Dispute of civil nature--Criminal Courts, duly of. -

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hukum Chand

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
73Ind.Cas.805

Excerpt

penal code (act xl v of 1860), section 426 - mischief--removal of earth by tenant in exercise of bona fide right--dispute of civil nature--criminal courts, duly of. - ryves, j.1. in this case hukum chand was fined rs. 10 under section 426 of the indian penal code for having removed some earth from two plots of land, one described as banjar and the other a grove, which were in the possession of the zemindar of the village, without his consent. we are not informed as to how much earth was taken. but evidently there was more than a mere handful or so because in the grounds of appeal in the court below there is no ground taken to the effect that section 95 of the indian penal code would cover the case. the gravamen of the charge, of course, is that the applicant took this earth without getting the consent of the zemindar and the zemindar's karinda has brought this charge in support of the sacred rights of the zemindar. the defence was that the accused was only following the custom of the village and taking earth as every body else did when they wanted it. i do not think that the criminal courts were meant to decide questions which are really of a civil nature between the landlord and his tenants.2. this is a very petty matte. but, however, to discourage, criminal courts from taking up such cases, i set aside the conviction and sentence and direct the fine to be re funded if paid.

Full Judgment

Ryves, J.

1. In this case Hukum Chand was fined Rs. 10 under Section 426 of the Indian Penal Code for having removed some earth from two plots of land, one described as banjar and the other a grove, which were in the possession of the zemindar of the village, without his consent. We are not informed as to how much earth was taken. But evidently there was more than a mere handful or so because in the grounds of appeal in the Court below there is no ground taken to the effect that Section 95 of the Indian Penal Code would cover the case. The gravamen of the charge, of course, is that the applicant took this earth without getting the consent of the zemindar and the zemindar's karinda has brought this charge in support of the sacred rights of the zemindar. The defence was that the accused was only following the custom of the village and taking earth as every body else did when they wanted it. I do not think that the Criminal Courts were meant to decide questions which are really of a civil nature between the landlord and his tenants.

2. This is a very petty matte. But, however, to discourage, Criminal Courts from taking up such cases, I set aside the conviction and sentence and direct the fine to be re funded if paid.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial