Raghunandan Prasad Vs. Emperor

Raghunandan Prasad vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 03, 1922

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/482115

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/482115
Court: Allahabad
Judge: Lindsay, J.
Decided On: May 03, 1922
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898,), Ch. VIII - Order to produce sureties from within certain limits, legality of. -

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raghunandan Prasad

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In: AIR1922All489; 67Ind.Cas.352

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898,), ch. viii - order to produce sureties from within certain limits, legality of. - lindsay, j.1. this case has been admitted on one ground only, namely, the propriety of the order passed by the magistrate directing the accused to produce sureties who reside within a radius of five miles of the village of omraha.2. this order of the magistrate's is illegal. he has no authority to lay down any limits within which the sureties must reside. so much of the order, therefore, is set aside, and the magistrate will be directed to receive and accept any proper sureties who may offer themselves on behalf of the accused. let the record be returned.

Full Judgment

Lindsay, J.

1. This case has been admitted on one ground only, namely, the propriety of the order passed by the Magistrate directing the accused to produce sureties who reside within a radius of five miles of the village of Omraha.

2. This order of the Magistrate's is illegal. He has no authority to lay down any limits within which the sureties must reside. So much of the order, therefore, is set aside, and the Magistrate will be directed to receive and accept any proper sureties who may offer themselves on behalf of the accused. Let the record be returned.

Same Parties Raghunandan Prasad vs Emperor Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Lindsay, J.

Criminal