Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Phakkar

Emperor vs Phakkar

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jan 04, 1927
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/481105

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 78 - Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 110--Order to execute bond for good behaviour--Non-compliance--Punishment--Solitary confinement, whether can be imposed. - - 1. Phakkar had been ordered to execute a bond with two sureties for maintaining good behaviour und...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Phakkar

Legal References

Reported In
102Ind.Cas.342

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), section 78 - criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 110--order to execute bond for good behaviour--non-compliance--punishment--solitary confinement, whether can be imposed. - - 1. phakkar had been ordered to execute a bond with two sureties for maintaining good behaviour under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure. this order was affirmed by the sessions judge, but the accused failed to comply with the said order.sulaiman, j.1. phakkar had been ordered to execute a bond with two sureties for maintaining good behaviour under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure. this order was affirmed by the sessions judge, but the accused failed to comply with the said order. the magistrate accordingly directed that he should be kept in prison to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years including three months' solitary confinement unless and until he executed the bond and furnished the sureties asked for.2. the order directing the accused to undergo solitary confinement is obviously without jurisdiction. the power to impose solitary confinement is conferred by section 73 of the indian penal code, but that section applies only where a person has been convicted of an offence under the indian penal code and is not applicable to convictions under other laws, unless expressly made so. the order passed against the accused was under the code of criminal procedure which does not permit a solitary confinement.3. i accordingly modify the order passed and direct that the words 'which will include three months' solitary confinement' be deleted from the order.

Full Judgment

Sulaiman, J.

1. Phakkar had been ordered to execute a bond with two sureties for maintaining good behaviour under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This order was affirmed by the Sessions Judge, but the accused failed to comply with the said order. The Magistrate accordingly directed that he should be kept in prison to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years including three months' solitary confinement unless and until he executed the bond and furnished the sureties asked for.

2. The order directing the accused to undergo solitary confinement is obviously without jurisdiction. The power to impose solitary confinement is conferred by Section 73 of the Indian Penal Code, but that section applies only where a person has been convicted of an offence under the Indian Penal Code and is not applicable to convictions under other laws, unless expressly made so. The order passed against the accused was under the Code of Criminal Procedure which does not permit a solitary confinement.

3. I accordingly modify the order passed and direct that the words 'which will include three months' solitary confinement' be deleted from the order.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial