Mingan Vs. Emperor

Mingan vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Aug 18, 1922

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/478206

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/478206
Court: Allahabad
Judge: Stuart, J.
Decided On: Aug 18, 1922
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Section 31, applicability of - Cognisable case--Accused, whether can be directed to pay costs of Court-fees--Appeal--Revision. -

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mingan

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In: AIR1923All86; 81Ind.Cas.56

Excerpt

court fees act (vii of 1870), section 31, applicability of - cognisable case--accused, whether can be directed to pay costs of court-fees--appeal--revision. - stuart, j.1. the learned sessions judge has taken a correct view of the law.2. i direct that the amount of rs. 4-6-0 in respect of court fee stamps should not be leviable from mingan or if already realized should be refunded.

Full Judgment

Stuart, J.

1. The learned Sessions Judge has taken a correct view of the law.

2. I direct that the amount of Rs. 4-6-0 in respect of Court Fee Stamps should not be leviable from Mingan or if already realized should be refunded.

Same Parties Mingan vs Emperor Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge Stuart, J.

Miscellaneous