Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Puran and ors. Vs. Emperor

Puran and ors. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Feb 02, 1916
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/476865

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 110 - Magistrate neither District Magistrate nor Sub-Divisional Magistrate nor Magistrate of first class at time of passing orders, order by, if valid--Jurisdiction. - - 100 with two sureties to be of good behaviour for one year, and in default one year's rigorous i...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Puran and ors.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1916All222(1); 33Ind.Cas.317

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 110 - magistrate neither district magistrate nor sub-divisional magistrate nor magistrate of first class at time of passing orders, order by, if valid--jurisdiction. - - 100 with two sureties to be of good behaviour for one year, and in default one year's rigorous imprisonment under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure.1. this is an application to set aside the order of mr. munro, magistrate, whereby he ordered the applicants to execute bonds for rs. 100 with two sureties to be of good behaviour for one year, and in default one year's rigorous imprisonment under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure. this order was confirmed with some modification by the district magistrate. it is contended on behalf of the applicants that mr. munro's order was invalid because he was neither a district magistrate, a sub-divisional magistrate of meerut or a magistrate of the fist class when he made this order. it is admitted that when mr. munro commenced the investigation of the case he was a sub-divisional magistrate of meerut, but it is also admitted that at the date when he made his order he had ceased to be so section 110 only permits of the particular magistrates mentioned in the section dealing with such cases. it seems to me, therefore, that the order was invalid and made without jurisdiction. i accordingly set aside the order of mr. munro dated the 13th of july 1915 and also the order of the district magistrate dated the 20th of september 1915.

Full Judgment

1. This is an application to set aside the order of Mr. Munro, Magistrate, whereby he ordered the applicants to execute bonds for Rs. 100 with two sureties to be of good behaviour for one year, and in default one year's rigorous imprisonment under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. This order was confirmed with some modification by the District Magistrate. It is contended on behalf of the applicants that Mr. Munro's order was invalid because he was neither a District Magistrate, a Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Meerut or a Magistrate of the fist Class when he made this order. It is admitted that when Mr. Munro commenced the investigation of the case he was a Sub-Divisional Magistrate of Meerut, but it is also admitted that at the date when he made his order he had ceased to be so Section 110 only permits of the particular Magistrates mentioned in the section dealing with such cases. It seems to me, therefore, that the order was invalid and made without jurisdiction. I accordingly set aside the order of Mr. Munro dated the 13th of July 1915 and also the order of the District Magistrate dated the 20th of September 1915.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial