Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Jiwan Vs. Emperor

Jiwan vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jun 23, 1921
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/476576
Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jiwan

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1921All206; 67Ind.Cas.505

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 233 and 537, application of--property, stolen, recovered from accused separately--joint trial--illegality. - lindsay, j.1. this is an application in revision on behalf of one jiwan who has been convicted in the court of the magistrate on a charge under section 411. it appears that two other persons were tried along with jiwan, one of whom was acquitted the other being convicted. the latter has not made any application to this court.2. jiwan's conviction was upheld by the learned sessions judge in spite of the plea taken before him that the trial was illegal. there can be no doubt as to the illegality of the trial and i cannot agree with the judge who seems to have taken the view that an illegality of this kind can be cured by the application of section 537 of the criminal procedure code. i must give effect, therefore, to this application and set aside all the proceedings in the court below.3. the result is that the accused will be released.

Full Judgment

Lindsay, J.

1. This is an application in revision on behalf of one Jiwan who has been convicted in the Court of the Magistrate on a charge under Section 411. It appears that two other persons were tried along with Jiwan, one of whom was acquitted the other being convicted. The latter has not made any application to this Court.

2. Jiwan's conviction was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge in spite of the plea taken before him that the trial was illegal. There can be no doubt as to the illegality of the trial and I cannot agree with the Judge who seems to have taken the view that an illegality of this kind can be cured by the application of Section 537 of the Criminal Procedure Code. I must give effect, therefore, to this application and set aside all the proceedings in the Court below.

3. The result is that the accused will be released.


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial