Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mt. Sumaria Alias Bismilla Vs. Emperor

Mt. Sumaria Alias Bismilla vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Oct 21, 1925
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/474896

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mt. Sumaria Alias Bismilla

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1926All247

Excerpt

- dalal, j.1. the applicant woman mt. sumaria alias bismilla, was ordered by the learned district magistrate of ghazipur to pay compensation of rs. 50 to each one of three constables whom she accused of having committed extortion. the total sum she was required to pay was rs. 150.2. when she went up in appeal the learned sessions judge held that no appeal lay. i do not think that he was right in this conclusion. in clauses 1 and 2 of section 250, where the limit of compensation is stated, it is definitely laid down that the limit of compensation is rs. 100 with respect to every accused person. on the other hand in clause 3 which relates to appeal, the words are general and the right of appeal is given wherever the order relates to the payment of compensation exceeding rs. 50. in clause 3 the words of clauses 1 and 2 are not repeated of compensation to each individual accused person. i am, therefore, of opinion that when the total amount of compensation ordered to be paid by a complainant in one particular case exceeds rs. 50 there is a right of appeal even though the amount of compensation to be paid to each individual accused person may not exceed the sum of rs. 50.3. i do not, however, think it worth while to send the case back to the sessions court. i have gone through the facts of the case and the fine of rs. 150 appears to me to be excessive. i reduce the amount to rs. 20 payable to each accused person and direct that the excess amount, if recovered from the applicant woman, shall be refunded to her.

Full Judgment

Dalal, J.

1. The applicant woman Mt. Sumaria alias Bismilla, was ordered by the learned District Magistrate of Ghazipur to pay compensation of Rs. 50 to each one of three constables whom she accused of having committed extortion. The total sum she was required to pay was Rs. 150.

2. When she went up in appeal the learned Sessions Judge held that no appeal lay. I do not think that he was right in this conclusion. In Clauses 1 and 2 of Section 250, where the limit of compensation is stated, it is definitely laid down that the limit of compensation is Rs. 100 with respect to every accused person. On the other hand in Clause 3 which relates to appeal, the words are general and the right of appeal is given wherever the order relates to the payment of compensation exceeding Rs. 50. In Clause 3 the words of Clauses 1 and 2 are not repeated of compensation to each individual accused person. I am, therefore, of opinion that when the total amount of compensation ordered to be paid by a complainant in one particular case exceeds Rs. 50 there is a right of appeal even though the amount of compensation to be paid to each individual accused person may not exceed the sum of Rs. 50.

3. I do not, however, think it worth while to send the case back to the Sessions Court. I have gone through the facts of the case and the fine of Rs. 150 appears to me to be excessive. I reduce the amount to Rs. 20 payable to each accused person and direct that the excess amount, if recovered from the applicant woman, shall be refunded to her.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial