Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Phoolson Foundry Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Phoolson Foundry Works vs Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Oct 27, 1986
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/474312

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Civil Misc. Writ No. 457 of 1986
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Central excise - Appeal--Recovery--Issue of recovery certificate and attachment of goods during pendency of assesseee's appeal--Attached goods worth more than disputed amount--Goods not to be auctioned till disposal of appeal. -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Phoolson Foundry Works

Respondent

Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
1987(12)ECC332; 1987(27)ELT612(All)

Excerpt

central excise - appeal--recovery--issue of recovery certificate and attachment of goods during pendency of assesseee's appeal--attached goods worth more than disputed amount--goods not to be auctioned till disposal of appeal. - orderk.j. shetty, c.j. 1. the petitioner's appeal is pending before the customs, excise and gold control appellate tribunal, the respondent no. 3. during the pendency of the appeal, a recovery certificate has been issued for the realisation of the disputed amount. the collector of central excise, meerut, respondent no. 2, has made attachment of the petitioner's goods worth rs. 3,00,000/- which is more than the amount due against the petitioner.2. we also find that the tribunal, at the request of the petitioner for stay, has disputed with pre-deposit of penalty and duty and did not, however, grant stay since the petitioner could not furnish bank guarantee.3. petitioner's grievance is that the goods attached by the collector may not be sold till the appeal is pending before the tribunal and the tribunal should decide the appeal expeditiously.4. since the value of the attached goods is more than the amount due, we think it proper that the sale of attached goods shall not take place during the pendency of the appeal.5. thus we direct the respondents not to auction the attached goods till the disposal of the appeal. we also direct the appellate authority to decide the appeal expeditiously.6. subject to these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.7. let copies of this order be given to the counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges as early as possible.

Full Judgment

ORDER

K.J. Shetty, C.J.

1. The petitioner's appeal is pending before the Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal, the respondent No. 3. During the pendency of the appeal, a recovery certificate has been issued for the realisation of the disputed amount. The Collector of Central Excise, Meerut, respondent No. 2, has made attachment of the petitioner's goods worth Rs. 3,00,000/- which is more than the amount due against the petitioner.

2. We also find that the Tribunal, at the request of the petitioner for stay, has disputed with pre-deposit of penalty and duty and did not, however, grant stay since the petitioner could not furnish bank guarantee.

3. Petitioner's grievance is that the goods attached by the Collector may not be sold till the appeal is pending before the Tribunal and the Tribunal should decide the appeal expeditiously.

4. Since the value of the attached goods is more than the amount due, we think it proper that the sale of attached goods shall not take place during the pendency of the appeal.

5. Thus we direct the respondents not to auction the attached goods till the disposal of the appeal. We also direct the appellate authority to decide the appeal expeditiously.

6. Subject to these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

7. Let copies of this order be given to the counsel for the parties on payment of usual charges as early as possible.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial