Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Chander and ors. Vs. Emperor

Ram Chander and ors. vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Nov 19, 1919
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/473588

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898) Section 403 - Accused, trial of, for specific offence--Acquittal--Subsequent trial on same facts for same offence, legality of. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Chander and ors.

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1919All90(1); 54Ind.Cas.772

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898) section 403 - accused, trial of, for specific offence--acquittal--subsequent trial on same facts for same offence, legality of. - ryves, j.1. eight persons, all kurmis, were convicted by a magistrate of the first class of rioting and causing grievous hurt, and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and to pay fines. on appeal the learned additional sessions judge of mirzapur altered the conviction to one under section 147 read with section 323 of the indian penal code.2. on revision before me it was argued that this trial was barred by the provisions of section 403 of the code of criminal procedure. it appears that there was a riot of some sort between certain brahmins and certain kurmis. the police challaned the brahmins. thereupon one dina nath, a brahmin, filed a complaint in the court of muhammad mabboob alam, a magistrate of the third class, charging all the present applicants with rioting with the common object of causing hurt to the brahmins. that learned magistrate convicted four of the accused and acquitted six. he consequently held that no charge of rioting had been made out and passed his order under section 323 of the indian penal code against four only of the kurmis. this was on the 14th of may 1919, these four persons appealed to the district magistrate, who dismissed their appeals and went on to direct that each of the four appellants should execute a bond to keep the peace under section 106 of the criminal procedure code. thereafter one ramchander, another brahmin, filed a complaint on which this trial was held. it is argued that the facts which were the subject of enquiry in the first trial before muhammad mahboob alam are exactly the same as the facts which were enquired into in this trial and the persons accused are the same. it seems to me, therefore, that under the provision of section 403, clause 1, they cannot be tried again. the result is that i allow this application. i set aside the convictions and direct that the accused be set at liberty and the fines, if paid, be refunded to them.

Full Judgment

Ryves, J.

1. Eight persons, all Kurmis, were convicted by a Magistrate of the first class of rioting and causing grievous hurt, and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and to pay fines. On appeal the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Mirzapur altered the conviction to one under Section 147 read with Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. On revision before me it was argued that this trial was barred by the provisions of Section 403 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It appears that there was a riot of some sort between certain Brahmins and certain Kurmis. The Police challaned the Brahmins. Thereupon one Dina Nath, a Brahmin, filed a complaint in the Court of Muhammad Mabboob Alam, a Magistrate of the third class, charging all the present applicants with rioting with the common object of causing hurt to the Brahmins. That learned Magistrate convicted four of the accused and acquitted six. He consequently held that no charge of rioting had been made out and passed his order under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code against four only of the Kurmis. This was on the 14th of May 1919, These four persons appealed to the District Magistrate, who dismissed their appeals and went on to direct that each of the four appellants should execute a bond to keep the peace under Section 106 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Thereafter one Ramchander, another Brahmin, filed a complaint on which this trial was held. It is argued that the facts which were the subject of enquiry in the first trial before Muhammad Mahboob Alam are exactly the same as the facts which were enquired into in this trial and the persons accused are the same. It seems to me, therefore, that under the provision of Section 403, Clause 1, they cannot be tried again. The result is that I allow this application. I set aside the convictions and direct that the accused be set at liberty and the fines, if paid, be refunded to them.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial