Baldeo Pandey Vs. Emperor

Baldeo Pandey vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Aug 06, 1921

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/472587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/472587
Court: Allahabad
Judge: Stuart, J.
Decided On: Aug 06, 1921
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

U.P. Municipalities Act (II of 1916), Section 295 - Refusal to pay Municipal charge--Offence--Obstruction. -

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Baldeo Pandey

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In: AIR1921All168; 64Ind.Cas.130

Excerpt

u.p. municipalities act (ii of 1916), section 295 - refusal to pay municipal charge--offence--obstruction. - stuart, j.1. i agree with the learned sessions judge and set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the fine, if paid, be refunded.

Full Judgment

Stuart, J.

1. I agree with the learned Sessions Judge and set aside the conviction and sentence and direct that the fine, if paid, be refunded.

Same Parties Baldeo Pandey vs Emperor Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge Stuart, J.

Miscellaneous