Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mahraji Vs. Dwarka and ors.

Mahraji vs Dwarka and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 11, 1910
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/470538

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Pre-emption - Wajib-ul-arz--'Hissadar karibi' means nearness in space. - - The words 'hissadar karibi' have been used in the wajib-ul-arz, as distinguishing that class of co-sharers from other co-sharers in the village and clearly mean co-sharers who are near as regards the share sold.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mahraji

Respondent

Dwarka and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
6Ind.Cas.702

Excerpt

pre-emption - wajib-ul-arz--'hissadar karibi' means nearness in space. - - the words 'hissadar karibi' have been used in the wajib-ul-arz, as distinguishing that class of co-sharers from other co-sharers in the village and clearly mean co-sharers who are near as regards the share sold.banerji, j.1. this is the plaintiff's appeal in a suit for pre-emption. the property sold is comprised in two villages, deoria granga and siara santha. there is no controversy in this appeal in regard to the property first mentioned. as regards the other property, namely, the share in siara santha, the purchasers are dwarka singh and mohan singh. it has been found that nandan the third purchaser has not purchased the share in that village. it has further been found that the two vendees of that village and the plaintiff are co-sharers of the vendor in the same khata. the plaintiff asserts that she had priority of right because she is related to the vendor, the vendor being the elder brother of her husband. under the wajib-ul-arz, a hissadar karibi has a right of pre-emption superior to that of any other hissadar in the village. the question is whether the words 'hissadar karibi' mean nearness in blood or nearness in share. the courts below have held that they mean nearness in space and i think that this view is correct. the words 'hissadar karibi' have been used in the wajib-ul-arz, as distinguishing that class of co-sharers from other co-sharers in the village and clearly mean co-sharers who are near as regards the share sold. there is nothing to indicate that blood relationship was intended. in this view the plaintiff has no priority, of right over the vendees as regards the share in siara santha and her suit has been rightly dismissed in respect of that share. i accordingly dismiss the appeal with costs.

Full Judgment

Banerji, J.

1. This is the plaintiff's appeal in a suit for pre-emption. The property sold is comprised in two villages, Deoria Granga and Siara Santha. There is no controversy in this appeal in regard to the property first mentioned. As regards the other property, namely, the share in Siara Santha, the purchasers are Dwarka Singh and Mohan Singh. It has been found that Nandan the third purchaser has not purchased the share in that village. It has further been found that the two vendees of that village and the plaintiff are co-sharers of the vendor in the same khata. The plaintiff asserts that she had priority of right because she is related to the vendor, the vendor being the elder brother of her husband. Under the wajib-ul-arz, a hissadar karibi has a right of pre-emption superior to that of any other hissadar in the village. The question is whether the words 'hissadar karibi' mean nearness in blood or nearness in share. The Courts below have held that they mean nearness in space and I think that this view is correct. The words 'hissadar karibi' have been used in the wajib-ul-arz, as distinguishing that class of co-sharers from other co-sharers in the village and clearly mean co-sharers who are near as regards the share sold. There is nothing to indicate that blood relationship was intended. In this view the plaintiff has no priority, of right over the vendees as regards the share in Siara Santha and her suit has been rightly dismissed in respect of that share. I accordingly dismiss the appeal with costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial