Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Babu Ram Vs. Emperor

Babu Ram vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 31, 1918
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/469276
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Babu Ram

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1919All26; 46Ind.Cas.848
Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Your first-pass case note in minutes — an 18-section AI Brief on this judgment, plus case-scoped chat. Part of AI Studio with Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind.

Try free for 7 days

Credentials emailed — then log in for AI Brief on this judgment. Already have an account? · Learn more

Excerpt

u.p. municipalities act (ii of 1916,), section 155 - octroi duty, person acting as broker of consignee, whether liable to pay--failure to pay octroi duty--offence. - p.c. banerji, j.1. the applicant babu ram has been convicted under section 155 of the municipalities act, no. ii of 1916, on a charge of having introduced into the limits of the municipality certain bags of sugar without payment of octroi duty. it has been fully proved by the evidence, which the court below has believed, that the applicant, who is a broker, took delivery of sixty bags of sugar and did not pay the octroi duty payable for the goods. it is said that as he was merely a broker and the agent of the consignee, the consignee should have been punished. this contention is, in my opinion, not tenable. the person liable to punishment is the person who introduces the goods into the limits of the municipality without payment of octroi duty. it was the accused who did this, and, therefore, he has been rightly convicted. i do not consider the fine inflicted on him to be unduly excessive having regard to the circumstances of the case. the application is dismissed.

Full Judgment

P.C. Banerji, J.

1. The applicant Babu Ram has been convicted under Section 155 of the Municipalities Act, No. II of 1916, on a charge of having introduced into the limits of the Municipality certain bags of sugar without payment of octroi duty. It has been fully proved by the evidence, which the Court below has believed, that the applicant, who is a broker, took delivery of sixty bags of sugar and did not pay the octroi duty payable for the goods. It is said that as he was merely a broker and the agent of the consignee, the consignee should have been punished. This contention is, in my opinion, not tenable. The person liable to punishment is the person who introduces the goods into the limits of the Municipality without payment of octroi duty. It was the accused who did this, and, therefore, he has been rightly convicted. I do not consider the fine inflicted on him to be unduly excessive having regard to the circumstances of the case. The application is dismissed.


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial