Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Fateh Singh Vs. Emperor

Fateh Singh vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jan 22, 1929
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/469054

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - It is represented that Fateh Singh is required to instruct his counsel, that members of two parties are being prosecuted, and that a member of the other party is released on bail and that, therefore, the other party will have a better chance of their case being properly represented in Court. 2. The trying Magi...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Fateh Singh

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1929All320

Excerpt

- - it is represented that fateh singh is required to instruct his counsel, that members of two parties are being prosecuted, and that a member of the other party is released on bail and that, therefore, the other party will have a better chance of their case being properly represented in court. 2. the trying magistrate is directed to release fateh singh on bail if he is satisfied that there is no apprehension of his absconding on proper sureties being ordered and secured.dalal, j.1. this is an application for bail of one fateh singh against whom an investigation is being made by the police on a charge under section 304, i.p.c., punishable with transportation for life. the magistrate guided as he was by the provisions of section 497, criminal p.c., expressed his inability to grant bail in such a case as there appeared to be reasonable grounds for believing that fateh singh was guilty. the sessions judge, however, had wide powers under section 498, criminal p.c., and has not considered the petition of appeal with care. it is represented that fateh singh is required to instruct his counsel, that members of two parties are being prosecuted, and that a member of the other party is released on bail and that, therefore, the other party will have a better chance of their case being properly represented in court. it is true that against the other party there is no charge under section 304, i.p.c. at the same time these reasons must weigh with a court, and if there is no danger of the applicant fateh singh absconding if released on bail i think that he should be so released. it was necessary for the sessions judge to consider all these points under section 498, criminal p.c.2. the trying magistrate is directed to release fateh singh on bail if he is satisfied that there is no apprehension of his absconding on proper sureties being ordered and secured. the trying magistrate will please fix a bond and security accordingly if, in his opinion, such a bond and security will be sufficient to prevent fateh singh from absconding.3. a copy of this order shall be sent to the trying magistrate through the district magistrate for necessary orders.

Full Judgment

Dalal, J.

1. This is an application for bail of one Fateh Singh against whom an investigation is being made by the police on a charge under Section 304, I.P.C., punishable with transportation for life. The Magistrate guided as he was by the provisions of Section 497, Criminal P.C., expressed his inability to grant bail in such a case as there appeared to be reasonable grounds for believing that Fateh Singh was guilty. The Sessions Judge, however, had wide powers under Section 498, Criminal P.C., and has not considered the petition of appeal with care. It is represented that Fateh Singh is required to instruct his counsel, that members of two parties are being prosecuted, and that a member of the other party is released on bail and that, therefore, the other party will have a better chance of their case being properly represented in Court. It is true that against the other party there is no charge under Section 304, I.P.C. At the same time these reasons must weigh with a Court, and if there is no danger of the applicant Fateh Singh absconding if released on bail I think that he should be so released. It was necessary for the Sessions Judge to consider all these points under Section 498, Criminal P.C.

2. The trying Magistrate is directed to release Fateh Singh on bail if he is satisfied that there is no apprehension of his absconding on proper sureties being ordered and secured. The trying Magistrate will please fix a bond and security accordingly if, in his opinion, such a bond and security will be sufficient to prevent Fateh Singh from absconding.

3. A copy of this order shall be sent to the trying Magistrate through the District Magistrate for necessary orders.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial