Jindal Steel and Power Vs. Cce

Jindal Steel and Power vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jan 24, 2008

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/46885

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/46885
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: S Jha, J T T.K.
Decided On: Jan 24, 2008
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jindal Steel and Power

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In: (2008)10STR291

Excerpt

.....appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the commissioner (appeals) dt. 22.5.07 dismissing the appeal of the appellant which it had preferred against the order-in-original of the asstt. commissioner, for non-compliance under section 35f of central excise act, 1944. it may be stated here that along with the appeal the appellant had filed application seeking stay of the order of addl.commissioner dt.30.10.06. the said application was heard and by order dt. 19.3.07, the appellant was directed to deposit a sum of rs. 5,00,000/- (rs. five lakhs). it is relevant to mention that the assessee is required to pre-deposit entire amount of duty etc. as the case may be, subject to the power of the appellant authority to waive the requirement of such deposit. as the appellant failed to deposit the said amount of rs. 5 lakhs and they comply with the said order dt.19.3.07, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order on 22.5.07.2. having heard ld. dr at length, we are satisfied that the order cannot be sustained and the matter is fit to go back for consideration on merit by the commissioner (appeals). we were taken through the circular of central board of excise & customs dt.8.10.01 wherein it was clarified that the levy of service tax extends to the whole of india including the territorial waters of india. in the instant case, service was rendered and payment was also made outside and no part of the activity took place within india or the territorial water thereof and therefore so far as the impugned part of service is concerned, the appellant is not liable to pay service tax on that portion. we are of the view that the said circular lends support to the appellant's case and the appellant had a strong prima-facie case which justified full waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit and consideration on merit.3. ld. dr relied upon a decision of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of honda indu nissan oxo chemicals inds. ltd. v. union of.....

Full Judgment

1. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 22.5.07 dismissing the appeal of the appellant which it had preferred against the order-in-original of the Asstt. Commissioner, for non-compliance under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. It may be stated here that along with the appeal the appellant had filed application seeking stay of the order of Addl.

Commissioner dt.30.10.06. The said application was heard and by order dt. 19.3.07, the appellant was directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rs. Five lakhs). It is relevant to mention that the assessee is required to pre-deposit entire amount of duty etc. as the case may be, subject to the power of the appellant authority to waive the requirement of such deposit. As the appellant failed to deposit the said amount of Rs. 5 lakhs and they comply with the said order dt.

19.3.07, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the order on 22.5.07.

2. Having heard Ld. DR at length, we are satisfied that the order cannot be sustained and the matter is fit to go back for consideration on merit by the Commissioner (Appeals). We were taken through the circular of Central Board of Excise & Customs dt.8.10.01 wherein it was clarified that the levy of service tax extends to the whole of India including the territorial waters of India. In the instant case, service was rendered and payment was also made outside and no part of the activity took place within India or the territorial water thereof and therefore so far as the impugned part of service is concerned, the appellant is not liable to pay service tax on that portion. We are of the view that the said circular lends support to the appellant's case and the appellant had a strong prima-facie case which justified full waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit and consideration on merit.

3. Ld. DR relied upon a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Honda Indu Nissan Oxo Chemicals Inds. Ltd. v. Union of India in support of the contention that the stay of waiver can be granted only in cases of undue hardship.

According to him, as no case of undue hardship in the sense of economic hardship is made out, the appellants did not deserve any waiver and therefore, the Commissioner was fully justified in directing the appellant to deposit service tax to the extent of 25% of the demand. We are of the view that the observations in para 15 of the judgment relied upon by Ld. DR have to be read alongwith the observations occurring in the earlier part of the judgment as follows: But if on a cursory glance it appears that the demand raised has no leg to stand, it would be undesirable to require the assessee to pay full or substantive part of the demand 4. We are of the view as mentioned above, that a prima-facie case is made out in favour of the appellant and we are, therefore, satisfied that it was entitled to complete waiver. Accordingly, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dt. 22.5.07 as also earlier dt. 19.3.07 directing pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs are set aside and it is directed that the appeal be heard on merit without requiring the appellant to make any pre-deposit.

It is made clear that no part of this order or observance contained herein shall be deemed to be expression of a concluded opinion of this Tribunal on merit.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Jindal Steel and Power vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge S Jha, J T T.K.