Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Chittira

Emperor vs Chittira

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jul 29, 1932
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/468024

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - The facts of the case are clearly proved.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Chittira

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1933All115

Excerpt

- - the facts of the case are clearly proved.pullan, j.1. chatra, who is a registered member of a criminal tribe, has been convicted of an offence under section 454, i.p.c. read with section 23, criminal tribes act, and has been sentenced to transportation for life. the facts of the case are clearly proved. this chatra entered a house through the roof in the daytime and stole a 'hansli' and some money. the owner of the house returned in time and he was arrested with the 'hansli' and the money in his possession. there is therefore no question as to his guilt.2. the sentence of transportation has been inflicted because in the opinion of the learned sessions judge, there was no alternative sentence under section 23, criminal tribes act. section 23, criminal tribes act, lays down that a member of a criminal tribe who having been convicted of any of the offences under the penal code specified in schedule 1, is convicted of the same, or of any other such offence, shall, on a second conviction, be sentenced to not less than seven years' rigorous imprisonment and, on a third conviction, to transportation for life. section 454, i.p.c. under which the appellant has been convicted, is not included in schedule 1, criminal tribes act. the! previous convictions of this person were one under section 454 and two under section 457. section 457 is included in schedule 1. thus, had the present conviction been one under section 457, the judge would have been right in sentencing this man to transportation for life. but in our opinion, section 23 refers only to convictions for offences specified in schedule 1. it has no application to a conviction for an offence which is not contained in schedule 1. the judge says that this is 'an offence similar in nature to the one of which he has been convicted twice before.' but these are not the words of the section. the words are 'the same or any other such offence,' and' any other such offence' means one of those offences mentioned in the schedule. thus section 23, criminal tribes act, does.....

Full Judgment

Pullan, J.

1. Chatra, who is a registered member of a criminal tribe, has been convicted of an offence under Section 454, I.P.C. read with Section 23, Criminal Tribes Act, and has been sentenced to transportation for life. The facts of the case are clearly proved. This Chatra entered a house through the roof in the daytime and stole a 'hansli' and some money. The owner of the house returned in time and he was arrested with the 'hansli' and the money in his possession. There is therefore no question as to his guilt.

2. The sentence of transportation has been inflicted because in the opinion of the learned Sessions Judge, there was no alternative sentence under Section 23, Criminal Tribes Act. Section 23, Criminal Tribes Act, lays down that a member of a criminal tribe who having been convicted of any of the offences under the Penal Code specified in Schedule 1, is convicted of the same, or of any other such offence, shall, on a second conviction, be sentenced to not less than seven years' rigorous imprisonment and, on a third conviction, to transportation for life. Section 454, I.P.C. under which the appellant has been convicted, is not included in Schedule 1, Criminal Tribes Act. The! previous convictions of this person were one under Section 454 and two under Section 457. Section 457 is included in Schedule 1. Thus, had the present conviction been one under Section 457, the Judge would have been right in sentencing this man to transportation for life. But in our opinion, Section 23 refers only to convictions for offences specified in Schedule 1. It has no application to a conviction for an offence which is not contained in Schedule 1. The Judge says that this is 'an offence similar in nature to the one of which he has been convicted twice before.' But these are not the words of the section. The words are 'the same or any other such offence,' and' any other such offence' means one of those offences mentioned in the schedule. Thus Section 23, Criminal Tribes Act, does not apply to this case, and the applicant can only be punished as an old offender, who has been twice convicted under Section 457, Penal Code, and once under Section 454, I.P.C. We accordingly alter the conviction to one under Section 454 read with Section 75, Penal Code, and reduce the sentence from transportation for life to seven years' rigorous imprisonment.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial