Khubi and ors. Vs. Bakhtayal

Khubi and ors. vs Bakhtayal

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Apr 25, 1918

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/467772

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/467772
Court: Allahabad
Judge: George Knox, J.
Decided On: Apr 25, 1918
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 522 - Order for possession--Jurisdiction to pass order after order for conviction--District Magistrate, jurisdiction of. -

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Khubi and ors.

Respondent

Bakhtayal

Legal References

Reported In: AIR1918All407; 46Ind.Cas.414

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 522 - order for possession--jurisdiction to pass order after order for conviction--district magistrate, jurisdiction of. - george knox, j.1. this is an application for revision of an order passed by the district magistrate of meerut under section 522 of the criminal procedure code, whereby he directed the police to give possession over some disputed land to one of the parties. whether the district magistrate has or has not the authority to pass the order in question it seems to me unnecessary to decide. the order which the learned magistrate has cow passed is an order which could and should have been passed long ago. i decline to interfere and dismiss the application. let the record be returned.

Full Judgment

George Knox, J.

1. This is an application for revision of an order passed by the District Magistrate of Meerut under Section 522 of the Criminal Procedure Code, whereby he directed the Police to give possession over some disputed land to one of the parties. Whether the District Magistrate has or has not the authority to pass the order in question it seems to me unnecessary to decide. The order which the learned Magistrate has cow passed is an order which could and should have been passed long ago. I decline to interfere and dismiss the application. Let the record be returned.

Same Parties Khubi and ors. vs Bakhtayal Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge George Knox, J.

Land Acquisition