Sudesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Sudesh Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. and ors.

Disposition Application allowed Court Allahabad Decided Jun 18, 1993

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/467028

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/467028
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: Virendra Saran, J.
Decided On: Jun 18, 1993
Case Number: Criminal Misc. Application No. 10214 of 1993
Subject: Criminal;Constitution
Disposition: Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Criminal;Constitution
Outcome / disposition: Application allowed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sudesh Kumar Sharma

Advocate A.B.L. Gour, Adv.

Respondent

State of U.P. and ors.

Advocate A.G.A.

Legal References

Reported In: 1994CriLJ937

Excerpt

- .....suffer. learned counsel for the applicant has invited my attention to an order passed by hon'ble kundan singh, j. in criminal misc. application no. 8990 of 1993, kedia transport ltd. v, state of u. p. in the case mentioned above, a similar circumstances hon'ble kundan singh, j. has directed that the property be released on furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee. i am in respectful agreement with the view taken by hon'ble kundan singh, j. the learned c.j.m., hamirpur has lost sight of the fact that businessmen need cash for transacting their business and if a huge amount of rs. 77,285/- is blocked the applicant will be handicapped for doing the business. care should always be taken not to strangulate businessmen as the prosperity of the country itself depends on free flow of business activity. the release of the beer on depositing such huge amount itself amounts to denial of the relief to the applicant. the learned c.j.m. should also have borne in mind that if the beer is not released it will become unfit for human consumption by the passage of time and hence the release should not have been impaired by such condition as depositing the cash amount. the order of the learned c.j.m. requiring cash security, should, therefore, be set aside.3. this application is allowed and it is directed that the cartoons of beer bottles may be released in favour of the applicant on furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee. the release of the beer should not i be delayed unnecessarily.4. with the above directions, this application is finally disposed of.5. a certified copy of this order shall be issued to the learned counsel for the applicant on payment of usual charges by 21-6-1993 positively.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Virendra Saran, J.

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned State Counsel.

2. I have gone through the order dated 14-5-93 passed by the C.J.M., Hamirpur. The learned C.J.M., Hamirpur has directed that 650 cartoons of beer bottles may be released in a favour of the applicant Sudesh Kumar Sharma on his furnishing cash Rs. 77,285/-. The learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that by depositing this huge amount of money the business of the applicant would suffer. Learned counsel for the applicant has invited my attention to an order passed by Hon'ble Kundan Singh, J. in Criminal Misc. Application No. 8990 of 1993, Kedia Transport Ltd. v, State of U. P. In the case mentioned above, a similar circumstances Hon'ble Kundan Singh, J. has directed that the property be released on furnishing security other than cash or Bank guarantee. I am in respectful agreement with the view taken by Hon'ble Kundan Singh, J. The learned C.J.M., Hamirpur has lost sight of the fact that businessmen need cash for transacting their business and if a huge amount of Rs. 77,285/- is blocked the applicant will be handicapped for doing the business. Care should always be taken not to strangulate businessmen as the prosperity of the country itself depends on free flow of business activity. The release of the beer on depositing such huge amount itself amounts to denial of the relief to the applicant. The learned C.J.M. should also have borne in mind that if the beer is not released it will become unfit for human consumption by the passage of time and hence the release should not have been impaired by such condition as depositing the cash amount. The order of the learned C.J.M. requiring cash security, should, therefore, be set aside.

3. This application is allowed and it is directed that the cartoons of beer bottles may be released in favour of the applicant on furnishing security other than cash or bank guarantee. The release of the beer should not I be delayed unnecessarily.

4. With the above directions, this application is finally disposed of.

5. A certified copy of this order shall be issued to the learned Counsel for the applicant on payment of usual charges by 21-6-1993 positively.

Same Court & Year Allahabad · 1993 Same Parties Sudesh Kumar Sharma vs State of U.P. and ors. Same Subject Criminal;Constitution Same Judge Virendra Saran, J.

Criminal;Constitution