Ashok Agarwal Vs. Cce

Ashok Agarwal vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Dec 19, 2007

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/46682

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/46682
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: S Kang, Vice, A T K.K.
Decided On: Dec 19, 2007
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashok Agarwal

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In: (2008)12STJ405CESTATNew(Delhi)

Excerpt

the applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of service tax of rs. 2,63,478/- and penalties. the applicants are providing the service of c & f agent to the fertilizer company. the applicant also given on rent godown for warehousing the goods of the same fertilizer company. the revenue wants to add the rent while arriving at the assessable value of the service provided by c & f agent.2. the contention of the applicant is that for giving godown on rent there is a separate contract, therefore, it cannot be considered as part of service of c & f agent.3. the contention of the revenue is that the goods regarding which the applicant is providing c & f agent are warehoused in the godown, therefore, the hiring of godown is a part of the service provided as c & f agent and the contention is also that as per the contract on hiring godown the applicant has to receive the goods for safe custody and also to despatch the goods from the godown. the applicant relied upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of gujarat state fertilizers & chem. ltd. v. ccek.d. associates v.cce reported in 2007 (7) str 6. we find that the facts of the above decisions are different from the facts of present case. as in the present case, the godown is used for warehousing the goods regarding which applicant performed the service of c & f agent, therefore, prima facie, we find it is not a fit case for waiver of demand. the applicants are directed to deposit an amount of rs. 50% of the demand of service tax within a period of six weeks. on deposit of the above-mentioned amount, the pre-deposit of remaining amount of service tax and penalties are waived. adjourned to 18.2.2008 for reporting compliance.

Full Judgment

The applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of Service Tax of Rs. 2,63,478/- and penalties. The applicants are providing the service of C & F agent to the fertilizer company. The applicant also given on rent godown for warehousing the goods of the same fertilizer company. The Revenue wants to add the rent while arriving at the assessable value of the service provided by C & F agent.

2. The contention of the applicant is that for giving godown on rent there is a separate contract, therefore, it cannot be considered as part of service of C & F agent.

3. The contention of the Revenue is that the goods regarding which the applicant is providing C & F agent are warehoused in the godown, therefore, the hiring of godown is a part of the service provided as C & F agent and the contention is also that as per the contract on hiring godown the applicant has to receive the goods for safe custody and also to despatch the goods from the godown. The applicant relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chem. Ltd. v. CCEK.D. Associates v.CCE reported in 2007 (7) STR 6. We find that the facts of the above decisions are different from the facts of present case. As in the present case, the godown is used for warehousing the goods regarding which applicant performed the service of C & F agent, therefore, prima facie, we find it is not a fit case for waiver of demand. The applicants are directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 50% of the demand of Service Tax within a period of six weeks. On deposit of the above-mentioned amount, the pre-deposit of remaining amount of Service Tax and penalties are waived. Adjourned to 18.2.2008 for reporting compliance.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Ashok Agarwal vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge S Kang, Vice, A T K.K.