Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: Nand Prasad and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Feb 22, 1909
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/466645

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 107, 112 and 115, Schedule V No. 12. - Order to execute bond to keep the peace--Non-compliance with, Procedure in Chapter 8 of the Code--Revision. - - if he deems it necessary to take farther proceedings and bind over the applicants to keep the peace he should stat...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: Nand Prasad and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
1Ind.Cas.211

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 107, 112 and 115, schedule v no. 12. - order to execute bond to keep the peace--non-compliance with, procedure in chapter 8 of the code--revision. - - if he deems it necessary to take farther proceedings and bind over the applicants to keep the peace he should state clearly in his judgment whether or not he finds on the evidence that the applicants are likely to commit a breach of the peace.aikman, j.1. this is an application for the revision of an order of a magistrate of the first class directing the applicants to give each a personal bond in the sum of rs. 100 to keep the peace for one year. an examination of the record shows that the magistrate has not complied with the procedure prescribed in chapter viii of the code of criminal procedure. the summonses issued to the applicants were not accompanied by a copy of the order made under section 112 as is required by section 115 of the code. had the summonses to the applicants contained the substance of the information upon which the magistrate acted, i might have overlooked this defect, but the summonses too are not in accord with the form set out in schedule v no. 12 of the code. i am unable to say that the applicants have not been prejudiced by the neglect of the magistrate to comply with the provisions of the law. i, therefore, allow the application and set aside the order of the magistrate, dated the 10th of october 1908. if the magistrate deems it necessary to take further proceedings against the applicants, he must take care to comply strictly with the provisions of the law. the magistrate has written a very hesitating judgment; if he deems it necessary to take farther proceedings and bind over the applicants to keep the peace he should state clearly in his judgment whether or not he finds on the evidence that the applicants are likely to commit a breach of the peace.

Full Judgment

Aikman, J.

1. This is an application for the revision of an order of a Magistrate of the first Class directing the applicants to give each a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 100 to keep the peace for one year. An examination of the record shows that the Magistrate has not complied with the procedure prescribed in Chapter VIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The summonses issued to the applicants were not accompanied by a copy of the order made under Section 112 as is required by Section 115 of the Code. Had the summonses to the applicants contained the substance of the information upon which the Magistrate acted, I might have overlooked this defect, but the summonses too are not in accord with the form set out in Schedule V No. 12 of the Code. I am unable to say that the applicants have not been prejudiced by the neglect of the Magistrate to comply with the provisions of the law. I, therefore, allow the application and set aside the order of the Magistrate, dated the 10th of October 1908. If the Magistrate deems it necessary to take further proceedings against the applicants, he must take care to comply strictly with the provisions of the law. The Magistrate has written a very hesitating judgment; if he deems it necessary to take farther proceedings and bind over the applicants to keep the peace he should state clearly in his judgment whether or not he finds on the evidence that the applicants are likely to commit a breach of the peace.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial