Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kanpur Security Services Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Kanpur Security Services vs Commissioner of C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Nov 27, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/46524

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kanpur Security Services

Respondent

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2008)10STR12

Excerpt

1. on going through the relevant record and the impugned order and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has approached the hon'ble high court for recovery of the service tax amount from bhel which is a government of india undertaking and also taking into account the fact that merely half of the service tax which was paid by the recipient has been deposited and that the applicant is a retired defence services officer of seventy years age and seems not having sufficient means, 2. the requirement of pre-deposit is waived during the pendency of the appeal/the appeal will now come up for final hearing in its due course.this application is disposed of accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. On going through the relevant record and the impugned order and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has approached the Hon'ble High Court for recovery of the service tax amount from BHEL which is a Government of India Undertaking and also taking into account the fact that merely half of the service tax which was paid by the recipient has been deposited and that the applicant is a retired Defence Services officer of seventy years age and seems not having sufficient means, 2. The requirement of pre-deposit is waived during the pendency of the appeal/The appeal will now come up for final hearing in its due course.

This application is disposed of accordingly.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial