Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Desraj Singh Vs. Emperor

Desraj Singh vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Aug 05, 1919
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/464653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 110, 437 - Enquiry under Section 110--Further inquiry, whether can be directed--District Magistrate, power of. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Desraj Singh

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1919All174; 52Ind.Cas.672

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), sections 110, 437 - enquiry under section 110--further inquiry, whether can be directed--district magistrate, power of. - wallach, j.1. the applicant, desraj, had been discharged by a magistrate of the first class in an enquiry under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure. the district magistrate of mainpuri ordered a further enquiry under section 437. against that order desraj has applied in revision to this court. in khargav. emperor 22 ind. cas. 183 : 12 a.l.j. 167 : 15 cr. l.j. 39 : 36 a.147 a divisional bench of this court has held that a district magistrate has jurisdiction to direct further enquiry in a case where a person has been discharged in an enquiry under section 110 of the code of criminal procedure. i am bound by that ruling and, therefore, have to hold that the district magistrate had jurisdiction to pass the order which is attacked in this revision. the only question that remains is whether he was justified, in the exercise of his jurisdiction, in ordering a further enquiry. i am not prepared to tie the magistrate's hands, and to hold that be was not justified in passing the order and, therefore, reject this application.

Full Judgment

Wallach, J.

1. The applicant, Desraj, had been discharged by a Magistrate of the First Class in an enquiry under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The District Magistrate of Mainpuri ordered a further enquiry under Section 437. Against that order Desraj has applied in revision to this Court. In Khargav. Emperor 22 Ind. Cas. 183 : 12 A.L.J. 167 : 15 Cr. L.J. 39 : 36 A.147 a Divisional Bench of this Court has held that a District Magistrate has jurisdiction to direct further enquiry in a case where a person has been discharged in an enquiry under Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. I am bound by that ruling and, therefore, have to hold that the District Magistrate had jurisdiction to pass the order which is attacked in this revision. The only question that remains is whether he was justified, in the exercise of his jurisdiction, in ordering a further enquiry. I am not prepared to tie the Magistrate's hands, and to hold that be was not justified in passing the order and, therefore, reject this application.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial