Grover Suri and Associate Vs. Cce

Grover Suri and Associate vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 15, 2007

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/46283

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/46283
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: P Das
Decided On: Oct 15, 2007
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Grover Suri and Associate

Respondent

Cce

Excerpt

1. the applicant filed this application for modification of the stay order no. 500/07-sm(br) dated 11.7.07 directing to pre-deposit the entire amount of penalty and to report compliance on 17.9.07. ld.advocate submits that the stay order was passed ex-parte. he submits that the applicant is proprietorship firm and the proprietor was out of town when the notice was issued. therefore, the applicant failed to appear at the time of hearing of the stay application.2. after hearing both sides, i find that that there is sufficient reason to recall the stay order dated 11.7.07. hence, the stay order dated 11.7.07 passed ex-parte is recalled. the application is allowed.

Full Judgment

1. The applicant filed this application for modification of the Stay Order No. 500/07-SM(BR) dated 11.7.07 directing to pre-deposit the entire amount of penalty and to report compliance on 17.9.07. Ld.

Advocate submits that the Stay Order was passed ex-parte. He submits that the applicant is proprietorship firm and the proprietor was out of town when the notice was issued. Therefore, the applicant failed to appear at the time of hearing of the stay application.

2. After hearing both sides, I find that that there is sufficient reason to recall the Stay Order dated 11.7.07. Hence, the Stay Order dated 11.7.07 passed ex-parte is recalled. The application is allowed.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Grover Suri and Associate vs Cce Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge P Das