Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Param Sukh and ors. Vs. Ram Dayal

Param Sukh and ors. vs Ram Dayal

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 31, 1969
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/461901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Privy Council decree - Execution for costs--Rate of exchange--Civil Procedure Code, Section 610--Meaning of 'for the time being.' -

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Param Sukh and ors.

Respondent

Ram Dayal

Legal References

Reported In
(1886)ILR8All650

Excerpt

privy council decree - execution for costs--rate of exchange--civil procedure code, section 610--meaning of 'for the time being.' - oldfield, j.1. this appeal is preferred against the order of the subordinate judge of aligarh, passed upon objections of the judgment-debtor, against whom a decree of the privy council was being executed. the decree-holders took out execution for a sum of 119-11 awarded to them, and the question is, at what rate of exchange that sum should be made available to the decree-holders in rupees.2. it appears to me that, under the last paragraph of section 610, the amount payable must be estimated at the rate of exchange 'or the time being fixed by the secretary of state for india in council,' and that the words 'for the time being' mean the year in which the amount is realized, or paid, or execution taken out, and not the year in which the decree was passed. the rate of exchange being fixed yearly by the secretary of state for india in council, the rate of exchange on the date of the application for execution was the proper rate of exchange the decree-holders were entitled to. on this point, therefore, this appeal succeeds.3. the appellants' pleader gives up the other plea as to the decree-holder's right to costs of execution.4. the lower court must be directed to proceed with the application for execution of decree in accordance with the view of the law recorded above.5. the decree-holders, appellants, are entitled to the costs of this appeal, which are fixed at one gold mohur or rs. 16.tyrrell, j.6. i concur.

Full Judgment

Oldfield, J.

1. This appeal is preferred against the order of the Subordinate Judge of Aligarh, passed upon objections of the judgment-debtor, against whom a decree of the Privy Council was being executed. The decree-holders took out execution for a sum of 119-11 awarded to them, and the question is, at what rate of exchange that sum should be made available to the decree-holders in rupees.

2. It appears to me that, under the last paragraph of Section 610, the amount payable must be estimated at the rate of exchange 'or the time being fixed by the Secretary of State for India in Council,' and that the words 'for the time being' mean the year in which the amount is realized, or paid, or execution taken out, and not the year in which the decree was passed. The rate of exchange being fixed yearly by the Secretary of State for India in Council, the rate of exchange on the date of the application for execution was the proper rate of exchange the decree-holders were entitled to. On this point, therefore, this appeal succeeds.

3. The appellants' pleader gives up the other plea as to the decree-holder's right to costs of execution.

4. The lower Court must be directed to proceed with the application for execution of decree in accordance with the view of the law recorded above.

5. The decree-holders, appellants, are entitled to the costs of this appeal, which are fixed at one gold mohur or Rs. 16.

Tyrrell, J.

6. I concur.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial