Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Kundan and ors.

Emperor vs Kundan and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided May 22, 1914
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/460938

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 118 and 123 - Security for good behaviour--Imprisonment in default not to include solitary confinement. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Kundan and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
(1914)ILR36All495

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, sections 118 and 123 - security for good behaviour--imprisonment in default not to include solitary confinement. - chamier, j.1. in this case the magistrate passed an order under section 118 of the code of criminal procedure, and when the security demanded was not forthcoming directed that the persons concerned should be rigorously imprisoned for one year, of which two months would be spent in solitary confinement. he had no power to order solitary confinement in a case of this kind. so much of his order as directs that kundan, sumer singh and kalian shah be kept in solitary confinement for two months is set aside.

Full Judgment

Chamier, J.

1. In this case the Magistrate passed an order under Section 118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and when the security demanded was not forthcoming directed that the persons concerned should be rigorously imprisoned for one year, of which two months would be spent in solitary confinement. He had no power to order solitary confinement in a case of this kind. So much of his order as directs that Kundan, Sumer Singh and Kalian Shah be kept in solitary confinement for two months is set aside.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial