Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Madhya Pradesh Consultancy Vs. C.C.E.

Madhya Pradesh Consultancy vs C.C.E.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Aug 01, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45947

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madhya Pradesh Consultancy

Respondent

C.C.E.

Excerpt

2. the misc. application seeks permission to present additional materials. the same is allowed.3. service tax demand has been made against the appellant by treating the services provided to various govt. agencies as management consultancy and engineering consultancy service.4. we have been taken through relating to the engagement. it is seen that the nature of the work is field evaluation and data collection about various projects launched by the govt. like afforestation.prima-facie, we are of the view that there is no management consultancy or engineering consultancy in the performance of such services.5. tax demand is not prima-facie sustainable. stay application is allowed and recovery stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

Full Judgment

2. The Misc. application seeks permission to present additional materials. The same is allowed.

3. Service Tax demand has been made against the appellant by treating the services provided to various Govt. agencies as Management Consultancy and Engineering Consultancy service.

4. We have been taken through relating to the engagement. It is seen that the nature of the work is field evaluation and data collection about various projects launched by the Govt. like afforestation.

Prima-facie, we are of the view that there is no Management Consultancy or Engineering Consultancy in the performance of such services.

5. Tax demand is not prima-facie sustainable. Stay application is allowed and recovery stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial