Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rishabh Travels Vs. Cce

Rishabh Travels vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jul 06, 2007
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45790

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rishabh Travels

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2008)9STR575

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. the applicant filed this application for modification of the stay order in pursuance to the order dt. 10.4.07 passed by the hon'ble high court of rajasthan at jodhpur. the hon'ble high court held as under: ld. counsel for the appellant states that subsequent to the decision of the tribunal the department itself has waived 60% of the service tax liability in respect of operators like the petitioner and, therefore, the liability of the petitioner has substantially been reduced in terms of the said circular of service tax and the amount that has been deposited by the petitioner, fulfilled the condition of order passed by the tribunal, if the balance amount after taking into account the waiving of tax for the period in question is only considered to be outstanding against the assessee. the assessee - appellant may move an appropriate application before the tribunal bringing out these facts. if such application is made within 4 weeks, the tribunal shall decide the said application with the reasoned order.2. the notification no. 15/07-st dt. 4.4.07 allowed abatement of 60% of service tax in respect of tour operators for the period 1.4.200 to 4.2.2004. revenue submitted that in view of this abatement, the amount of tax comes to approximately rs. 10.7 lakhs. the contention of the applicant is that after passing the stay order by the tribunal, the applicant had already deposited an amount of rs. 4,15,500/-. the tribunal vide stay order dt. 16.10.06 directed the applicant to deposit 50% of the amount of service tax. therefore, in view of the abatement given by the notification, the amount already deposited is sufficient for hearing of the appeal. pre-deposit of remaining amount of service tax and penalty is waived. stay order is modified as above.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides. The applicant filed this application for modification of the stay order in pursuance to the order dt. 10.4.07 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The Hon'ble High Court held as under: Ld. Counsel for the appellant states that subsequent to the decision of the Tribunal the department itself has waived 60% of the service tax liability in respect of operators like the petitioner and, therefore, the liability of the petitioner has substantially been reduced in terms of the said circular of service tax and the amount that has been deposited by the petitioner, fulfilled the condition of order passed by the Tribunal, if the balance amount after taking into account the waiving of tax for the period in question is only considered to be outstanding against the assessee.

The assessee - appellant may move an appropriate application before the Tribunal bringing out these facts. If such application is made within 4 weeks, the Tribunal shall decide the said application with the reasoned order.

2. The notification No. 15/07-ST dt. 4.4.07 allowed abatement of 60% of service tax in respect of tour operators for the period 1.4.200 to 4.2.2004. Revenue submitted that in view of this abatement, the amount of tax comes to approximately Rs. 10.7 lakhs. The contention of the applicant is that after passing the stay order by the Tribunal, the applicant had already deposited an amount of Rs. 4,15,500/-. The Tribunal vide stay order dt. 16.10.06 directed the applicant to deposit 50% of the amount of service tax. Therefore, in view of the abatement given by the notification, the amount already deposited is sufficient for hearing of the appeal. Pre-deposit of remaining amount of service tax and penalty is waived. Stay order is modified as above.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial