Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Queen-Empress Vs. O' Brien (21.08.1896 - ALLHC)

Queen-Empress vs O' Brien

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 31, 1969
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/457732

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, Sections 179, 185 - Jurisdiction--Place where consequences of act ensued--Criminal breach of trust--Act No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Section 408. - - The applicant went to Cawnpore and failed to account.

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-Empress

Respondent

O' Brien

Legal References

Reported In
(1897)ILR19All111

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, sections 179, 185 - jurisdiction--place where consequences of act ensued--criminal breach of trust--act no. xlv of 1860 (indian penal code), section 408. - - the applicant went to cawnpore and failed to account.john edge, kt., c.j.1. this is an application to the high court to act under section 185 of the code of criminal procedure. the case against the applicant is one of an offence alleged to have been committed by him under section 408 of the indian penal code. the contention on his behalf is that, if he committed any offence, it was committed in lower bengal and not within the magistrates jurisdiction at cawnpore. of course i express no opinion whatever as to whether the applicant committed an offence at all. that matter has yet to be decided. if, however, he parted with goods of his employers in lower bengal and did not remit the price of those goods, as he was bound to do, to his employers in cawnpore, it appears to me that the case comes within section 179 of the code of criminal procedure; that the consequence of the applicant having made away with, for his own purposes, goods of his employers in lower bengal, or the price of them, if he did so, was that a loss of the value of those goods ensued to his employers in cawnpore. it might be very difficult to prove where the actual offence of breach of trust was committed, of course the applicant denies he has committed any. at one time he said the goods were on their way to cawnpore. another time he said the goods were at lucknow. the goods have disappeared. the applicant went to cawnpore and failed to account. the matter oan be inquired into at cawnpore, and the magistrate at cawnpore has jurisdiction in the case. i dismiss the application. as to the charge relating to the coal i have not sufficient facts before me to decide whether the magistrate has jurisdiction to inquire or not.

Full Judgment

John Edge, Kt., C.J.

1. This is an application to the High Court to act under Section 185 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The case against the applicant is one of an offence alleged to have been committed by him under Section 408 of the Indian Penal Code. The contention on his behalf is that, if he committed any offence, it was committed in Lower Bengal and not within the Magistrates jurisdiction at Cawnpore. Of course I express no opinion whatever as to whether the applicant committed an offence at all. That matter has yet to be decided. If, however, he parted with goods of his employers in Lower Bengal and did not remit the price of those goods, as he was bound to do, to his employers in Cawnpore, it appears to me that the case comes within Section 179 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; that the consequence of the applicant having made away with, for his own purposes, goods of his employers in Lower Bengal, or the price of them, if he did so, was that a loss of the value of those goods ensued to his employers in Cawnpore. It might be very difficult to prove where the actual offence of breach of trust was committed, Of course the applicant denies he has committed any. At one time he said the goods were on their way to Cawnpore. Another time he said the goods were at Lucknow. The goods have disappeared. The applicant went to Cawnpore and failed to account. The matter oan be inquired into at Cawnpore, and the Magistrate at Cawnpore has jurisdiction in the case. I dismiss the application. As to the charge relating to the coal I have not sufficient facts before me to decide whether the Magistrate has jurisdiction to inquire or not.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial