Queen-empress Vs. Madho

Queen-empress vs Madho

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 31, 1969

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/456620

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/456620
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: Straight, Offg. C.J.,; Oldfield,; Brodhurst and; Tyrrell, JJ.
Decided On: Dec 31, 1969
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Prosecution, withdrawal from - Government Pleader--Public Prosecutor--Criminal Procedure Code, Section 494. - - and we desire only to say that we are satisfied that the person charged with the prosecution had not the power of a Public Prosecutor, with regard to withdrawal, under Section 491 of the Criminal Procedu...

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Queen-empress

Respondent

Madho

Legal References

Reported In: (1886)ILR8All291

Excerpt

prosecution, withdrawal from - government pleader--public prosecutor--criminal procedure code, section 494. - - and we desire only to say that we are satisfied that the person charged with the prosecution had not the power of a public prosecutor, with regard to withdrawal, under section 491 of the criminal procedure code.straight, offg. c.j, oldfield, brodhurst and tyrrell, jj.1. we assume, for the purpose of answering this reference, that there was a withdrawal of the case; and we desire only to say that we are satisfied that the person charged with the prosecution had not the power of a public prosecutor, with regard to withdrawal, under section 491 of the criminal procedure code.

Full Judgment

Straight, Offg. C.J, Oldfield, Brodhurst and Tyrrell, JJ.

1. We assume, for the purpose of answering this reference, that there was a withdrawal of the case; and we desire only to say that we are satisfied that the person charged with the prosecution had not the power of a Public Prosecutor, with regard to withdrawal, under Section 491 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Same Parties Queen-empress vs Madho Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Straight, Offg. C.J.,; Oldfield,; Brodhurst and; Tyrrell, JJ.

Criminal