Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. Shia Central Board of Waqfs, U.P and Others</B>

Ram Kumar Gupta vs Shia Central Board of Waqfs, U.P and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Nov 10, 1998
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/456417

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.M.W.P. No. 19133 of 1998
Subject
Trusts and Societies

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Trusts and Societies - writ - Section 83 of Wakf Act, 1995 and Article 226 of Constitution of India - writ filed - remedy available before Tribunal - but Tribunal not constituted although 3 years have espied service paring of the Act - petitioner directed to approach the Tribunal as soon as it is constituted - State...

Key legal issue
Trusts and Societies
Acts & sections
Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 83 and 83(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Kumar Gupta

Advocate Dhruva Narayana and ;Bala Krishna Narayana, Advs.

Respondent

Shia Central Board of Waqfs, U.P and Others

Advocate S.C., ;Haider Husain and ;S.M. Dayal, Advs.

Legal References

Acts
Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 83 and 83(2); Constitution of India - Article 226
Reported In
1999(1)AWC450

Excerpt

trusts and societies - writ - section 83 of wakf act, 1995 and article 226 of constitution of india - writ filed - remedy available before tribunal - but tribunal not constituted although 3 years have espied service paring of the act - petitioner directed to approach the tribunal as soon as it is constituted - state government to constitute tribunal whether three months. - m. katju and s.l. saraf, jj.1. heard sri dhruva narayana for petitioner and learned standing counsel and shri haider husain for respondents.2. in our opinion, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the tribunal constituted under section 83 of the wakf act, 1995.3. learned counsel for petitioner states that the tribunalhad not yet been constituted although three years have expired since the passing of the act. hence we direct the state government to constitute the tribunal under section 83 within three months from today positively. the petitioner may approach the tribunal as soon as it is constituted and his application under section 83(2) will be decided within three months thereafter in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned. till the disposal of the application, status quo regarding the property in dispute shall be maintained.4. petition is disposed offinally.

Full Judgment

M. Katju and S.L. Saraf, JJ.

1. Heard Sri Dhruva Narayana for petitioner and learned standing counsel and Shri Haider Husain for respondents.

2. In our opinion, the petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach the Tribunal constituted under Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that the Tribunalhad not yet been constituted although three years have expired since the passing of the Act. Hence we direct the State Government to constitute the Tribunal under Section 83 within three months from today positively. The petitioner may approach the Tribunal as soon as it is constituted and his application under Section 83(2) will be decided within three months thereafter in accordance with law after hearing the parties concerned. Till the disposal of the application, status quo regarding the property in dispute shall be maintained.

4. Petition is disposed offinally.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial