Emperor Vs. Allu

Emperor vs Allu

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 06, 1922

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/455208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/455208
Court: Allahabad
Judge: Stuart, J.
Decided On: Dec 06, 1922
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Act No. XLV of 1860 (Indian Penal Code), Section 228 - Impertinent threat by accused to witness in box. - - An accused person who, during the hearing of a case, makes an impertinent threat to a witness in the box, has clearly committed an offence under Section 228. I refuse to interfere and return the papers.

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

Allu

Legal References

Reported In: (1923)ILR45All272

Excerpt

act no. xlv of 1860 (indian penal code), section 228 - impertinent threat by accused to witness in box. - - an accused person who, during the hearing of a case, makes an impertinent threat to a witness in the box, has clearly committed an offence under section 228. i refuse to interfere and return the papers.stuart, j.1. the learned sessions judge has misapprehended the scope of the section. an accused person who, during the hearing of a case, makes an impertinent threat to a witness in the box, has clearly committed an offence under section 228. i refuse to interfere and return the papers.

Full Judgment

Stuart, J.

1. The learned Sessions Judge has misapprehended the scope of the section. An accused person who, during the hearing of a case, makes an impertinent threat to a witness in the box, has clearly committed an offence under Section 228. I refuse to interfere and return the papers.

Same Parties Emperor vs Allu Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Stuart, J.

Criminal