Khargai Vs. Debi and anr.

Khargai vs Debi and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Jan 17, 1911

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/454606

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/454606
Court: Allahabad
Judge: Griffin, J.
Decided On: Jan 17, 1911
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Hindu Law - Mitakshara--Succession--Bandhu--Sister's son and son of father's uncle's daughter. -

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Khargai

Respondent

Debi and anr.

Legal References

Reported In: 9Ind.Cas.339

Excerpt

hindu law - mitakshara--succession--bandhu--sister's son and son of father's uncle's daughter. - 1. the last male owner of the property in suit was one bishen. the plaintiff who claims his property is his sister's son. the defendant who is in possession is the son of his father's uncle's daughter. according to the table of bandhus given at page 785 of mayne's hindu law, 7th edition, the plaintiff comes in as no. 3 in proximity of relationship as compared with the defendant who is no. 8. in view of this authority it appears to me that the decision of the court below was right. i dismiss this appeal with costs.

Full Judgment

1. The last male owner of the property in suit was one Bishen. The plaintiff who claims his property is his sister's son. The defendant who is in possession is the son of his father's uncle's daughter. According to the table of Bandhus given at page 785 of Mayne's Hindu Law, 7th Edition, the plaintiff comes in as No. 3 in proximity of relationship as compared with the defendant who is No. 8. In view of this authority it appears to me that the decision of the Court below was right. I dismiss this appeal with costs.

Same Parties Khargai vs Debi and anr. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Griffin, J.

Land Acquisition