Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Empress of India Vs. Thompson

Empress of India vs Thompson

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 31, 1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/453434

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Adultery - Act XLV of 1860 (Penal Code), Section 497--Compounding of Offences--Act X of 1872 (Criminal Procedure Code), Section 188. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Empress of India

Respondent

Thompson

Legal References

Reported In
(1880)ILR2All340

Excerpt

adultery - act xlv of 1860 (penal code), section 497--compounding of offences--act x of 1872 (criminal procedure code), section 188. - oldfield, j.1. since the conviction by the sessions judge the complainant has taken his wife back to live with him, and has asked this court to be allowed to compound the offence, a sanction which cannot be given at this stage of the proceedings, but looking to the existing relations between the parties and the fact that the prisoner thompson has been in custody since the 5th may, the court is of opinion that the punishment already undergone will suffice, and his release is directed.

Full Judgment

Oldfield, J.

1. Since the conviction by the Sessions Judge the complainant has taken his wife back to live with him, and has asked this Court to be allowed to compound the offence, a sanction which cannot be given at this stage of the proceedings, but looking to the existing relations between the parties and the fact that the prisoner Thompson has been in custody since the 5th May, the Court is of opinion that the punishment already undergone will suffice, and his release is directed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial