Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lal Singh Vs. Emperor

Lal Singh vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Nov 29, 1911
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/453133

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 407 - Appeal against order sanctioning prosecution--Power of District Magistrate to transfer--Jurisdiction. -

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lal Singh

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
14Ind.Cas.657

Excerpt

criminal procedure code (act v of 1898), section 407 - appeal against order sanctioning prosecution--power of district magistrate to transfer--jurisdiction. - richards, c.j.1. this is an application to set aside the orders of two magistrates of the first class, granting sanction to prosecute under sections 193 and 211 of indian penal code. the application for sanction was not made before the same magistrate as had originally tried the case, but it was made to his successor who granted sanction. there was an appeal to the district magistrate who apparently directed that the appeal should be heard by another magistrate of the first class subordinate to him. the learned district magistrate was evidently exercising what he considered to be the power vested in him under section 407. in my opinion this section does not entitle the district magistrate to send appeals under section 195 of the criminal procedure code to a magistrate of the first class subordinate to him. the section deals with appeals from convictions. this view of the section was taken in the case of sadhu lal v. ram churn pasi 30 c. 394. i, therefore, allow the application, set aside the order of mr. kasim beg chagtai, and send back the case to the district magistrate with directions that he should hear the appeal himself. i expressly abstain from stating any view upon the merits.

Full Judgment

Richards, C.J.

1. This is an application to set aside the orders of two Magistrates of the first class, granting sanction to prosecute under Sections 193 and 211 of Indian Penal Code. The application for sanction was not made before the same Magistrate as had originally tried the case, but it was made to his successor who granted sanction. There was an appeal to the District Magistrate who apparently directed that the appeal should be heard by another Magistrate of the first class subordinate to him. The learned District Magistrate was evidently exercising what he considered to be the power vested in him under Section 407. In my opinion this section does not entitle the District Magistrate to send appeals under Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code to a Magistrate of the first class subordinate to him. The section deals with appeals from convictions. This view of the section was taken in the case of Sadhu Lal v. Ram Churn Pasi 30 C. 394. I, therefore, allow the application, set aside the order of Mr. Kasim Beg Chagtai, and send back the case to the District Magistrate with directions that he should hear the appeal himself. I expressly abstain from stating any view upon the merits.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial