Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sham Lal Vs. Bindo

Sham Lal vs Bindo

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 05, 1906
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/452706

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Family

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Act No. VIII of 1890 (Guardians and Wards Act), Section 10 - Guardian and minor--Discretion of Court as to appointment of guardian. - - She is a Hindu lady in good circumstances, and it is obvious that if she had not cared for the child she would not have kept the minor so long under her charge. 'We cannot think t...

Key legal issue
Family

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sham Lal

Respondent

Bindo

Legal References

Reported In
(1907)ILR29All210

Excerpt

act no. viii of 1890 (guardians and wards act), section 10 - guardian and minor--discretion of court as to appointment of guardian. - - she is a hindu lady in good circumstances, and it is obvious that if she had not cared for the child she would not have kept the minor so long under her charge. 'we cannot think that the girl, under these circumstances, will be so happy as she is in the house of the maternal grand-mother.george knox and richards, jj.1. this is an appeal from an order passed by the district judge of moradabad under the guardians and wards act. the judge has appointed the father as guardian of the person of a hindu child and has directed that the minor, who is a girl nearly 10 years of ago, be removed from the custody of her maternal grandmother and be made over to the custody of her father. it is an admitted fact that, until this order was passed the girl has been, since the death of her mother, for a period of five years continuously residing with and has been cared for by the maternal grandmother. there is no suggestion that the maternal grandmother is in any way unfit to continue to be a guardian of the ward. she is a hindu lady in good circumstances, and it is obvious that if she had not cared for the child she would not have kept the minor so long under her charge. it is true that there is nothing against the father, but again it is an admitted fact that he has married a second time and the girl will have to go under the control of a step-mother, of whom probably she knows nothing. 'we cannot think that the girl, under these circumstances, will be so happy as she is in the house of the maternal grand-mother. what we have to consider is what will really be for the welfare of the minor. weighing all the circumstances we think that it will be more for the welfare of the minor to live with the maternal grandmother than with the step-mother. we accordingly decree the appeal, sot aside the order of the court below and direct that within one week from the time when our order reaches the court below and is notified to the parties, the girl be restored by the respondent to the custody of the appellant. we make no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

George Knox and Richards, JJ.

1. This is an appeal from an order passed by the District Judge of Moradabad under the Guardians and Wards Act. The Judge has appointed the father as guardian of the person of a Hindu child and has directed that the minor, who is a girl nearly 10 years of ago, be removed from the custody of her maternal grandmother and be made over to the custody of her father. It is an admitted fact that, until this order was passed the girl has been, since the death of her mother, for a period of five years continuously residing with and has been cared for by the maternal grandmother. There is no suggestion that the maternal grandmother is in any way unfit to continue to be a guardian of the ward. She is a Hindu lady in good circumstances, and it is obvious that if she had not cared for the child she would not have kept the minor so long under her charge. It is true that there is nothing against the father, but again it is an admitted fact that he has married a second time and the girl will have to go under the control of a step-mother, of whom probably she knows nothing. 'We cannot think that the girl, under these circumstances, will be so happy as she is in the house of the maternal grand-mother. What we have to consider is what will really be for the welfare of the minor. Weighing all the circumstances we think that it will be more for the welfare of the minor to live with the maternal grandmother than with the step-mother. We accordingly decree the appeal, sot aside the order of the Court below and direct that within one week from the time when our order reaches the Court below and is notified to the parties, the girl be restored by the respondent to the custody of the appellant. We make no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial