Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

S.J. Enterprises Vs. Cce

S.J. Enterprises vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Apr 03, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

S.J. Enterprises

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)9STJ144CESTATNew(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. the applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax. the applicant has already deposited 50% of the amount of confirmed demand. the demand is confirmed by treating the applicant as cargo handling service provider. the contention of the appellant is that they are only providing labour to the manufacturer and the work of loading and unloading is being done by the manufacturer with their machines. therefore, the appellants are not providing any service, which attracts service tax. the appellant relied upon the decision in the case of j.j. enterprises v. cce raipur reported in 2006 (3) str 655 to submit that where the assessee was not owner of the machines which are used for loading and unloading, their role being limited to supply of manpower, they are not rendering cargo handling service and were not liable to tax as such.2. in view of the decision of tribunal, the amount already deposited is sufficient for hearing the appeals. the pre-deposit of remaining amount of service tax and penalties are waived for heaving of the appeals. the stay applications are allowed.

Full Judgment

1. The applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax. The applicant has already deposited 50% of the amount of confirmed demand. The demand is confirmed by treating the applicant as Cargo Handling Service Provider. The contention of the appellant is that they are only providing labour to the manufacturer and the work of loading and unloading is being done by the manufacturer with their machines. Therefore, the appellants are not providing any service, which attracts service tax. The appellant relied upon the decision in the case of J.J. Enterprises v. CCE Raipur reported in 2006 (3) STR 655 to submit that where the assessee was not owner of the machines which are used for loading and unloading, their role being limited to supply of manpower, they are not rendering cargo handling service and were not liable to tax as such.

2. In view of the decision of Tribunal, the amount already deposited is sufficient for hearing the appeals. The pre-deposit of remaining amount of service tax and penalties are waived for heaving of the appeals. The stay applications are allowed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial