Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kamal and Company Vs. Cce

Kamal and Company vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 26, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45168

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kamal and Company

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)8STR31

Excerpt

1. the dispute is about service tax on free service provided to automobiles. the submission is that the appellant rendered this service as a part of the free 'after sale service' and it receives no payment towards the service from any party. it is being pointed out that wherever payment is received for service, tax is being paid. the contention in regard to free service is that it remains included in the sale price of the vehicle and therefore, cannot be taxed again.2. prima facie, there is merit in the appellant's contention. the stay application is allowed and requirement of pre-deposit is waived till disposal of the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. The dispute is about Service Tax on free service provided to automobiles. The submission is that the appellant rendered this service as a part of the free 'after sale service' and it receives no payment towards the service from any party. It is being pointed out that wherever payment is received for service, tax is being paid. The contention in regard to free service is that it remains included in the sale price of the vehicle and therefore, cannot be taxed again.

2. Prima facie, there is merit in the appellant's contention. The stay application is allowed and requirement of pre-deposit is waived till disposal of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial