Ram Dial Vs. Parshadi Lal

Ram Dial vs Parshadi Lal

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Dec 31, 1969

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/451296

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/451296
Court: Allahabad High Court
Judge: Pearson and ;Spankie, JJ.
Decided On: Dec 31, 1969
Subject: Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Suit for pre-emption - Deposit of purchase-money--Appellate Court, powers of--Act X of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code), Section 214. -

Key legal issue: Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Dial

Respondent

Parshadi Lal

Legal References

Reported In: (1880)ILR2All744

Excerpt

suit for pre-emption - deposit of purchase-money--appellate court, powers of--act x of 1877 (civil procedure code), section 214. - pearson, j.1. the grounds of appeal are overruled by the full bench decision in sheo prasad lal v. thakur rai h.c.r. n.w.p. 1868 p. 254, and it does not appear to us that the appellate court's action and order contravened the provisions of section 214, act x of 1877. the appeal is dismissed with costs.

Full Judgment

Pearson, J.

1. The grounds of appeal are overruled by the Full Bench decision in Sheo Prasad Lal v. Thakur Rai H.C.R. N.W.P. 1868 p. 254, and it does not appear to us that the Appellate Court's action and order contravened the provisions of Section 214, Act X of 1877. The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Same Parties Ram Dial vs Parshadi Lal Same Subject Civil Same Judge Pearson and ;Spankie, JJ.

Civil