Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Billu Tech. Video Communications Vs. Cce

Billu Tech. Video Communications vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 15, 2007
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45097

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Billu Tech. Video Communications

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)10STJ37CESTATNew(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. applicant filed this application for condoning the delay of 25 days.in view of the given the explanation, the application of condonation of delay is allowed. applicant filed this application for waiver of amount of service tax of rs. 1,38,369/- and penalties. applicant had already deposited an amount of rs. 64,500/-.2. the applicants are not disputing the liability of service tax, however, the contention of applicant is that they are only providing service to 310 customers, whereas, as per the case of revenue, the applicants were providing the service to 410 customers. keeping in view, the facts and circumstances of the case and we find that it is not a case for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of service tax.applicant are directed to deposit an amount of rs. 50,000/- within a period of six weeks from today and report compliance on 3^rd may 2007 and pre-deposit of duty are waived.

Full Judgment

1. Applicant filed this application for condoning the delay of 25 days.

In view of the given the explanation, the application of condonation of delay is allowed. Applicant filed this application for waiver of amount of service tax of Rs. 1,38,369/- and penalties. Applicant had already deposited an amount of Rs. 64,500/-.

2. The applicants are not disputing the liability of service tax, however, the contention of applicant is that they are only providing service to 310 customers, whereas, as per the case of revenue, the applicants were providing the service to 410 customers. Keeping in view, the facts and circumstances of the case and we find that it is not a case for waiver of pre-deposit of amount of service tax.

Applicant are directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 50,000/- within a period of six weeks from today and report compliance on 3^rd May 2007 and pre-deposit of duty are waived.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial