criminal procedure code, section 476 - practice--order for prosecution for perjury--court not bound to set out assignments of perjury alleged--civil procedure code (1908), section 115--revision--material irregularity. - cantonments act[c.a. no. 41/2006]. section 346 & cantonment fund (servants rules, 1937, rules 13, 14 & 15: [h.l. gokhale, ag. cj, p.v. hardas, naresh h. patil, r.m. borde & r.m. savant, jj] jurisdiction of school tribunal constituted under maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulations act, (3 of 1978) held, school run by the cantonment board is a primary school and it is not a school recognised by any such board comparable to the divisional board or the state board. the school tribunal constituted under section 8 of the maharashtra act cannot entertain appeals filed under section 9 by the employees working in schools which are established and administered by the cantonment board. teacher employed in the school run by cantonment board being covered under rule 2 (f) of the cantonment fund servants rules, 1937 can file appeal under rules 13, 14 and 15 to authorities provided therein against any order imposing any penalties etc. [deolali cantonment board v usha devidas dongre, 1993 mah. lj 74; 1993 lab ic 1858 overruled]. -- maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulations act, 1978
[act no. 3/1978]. sections 9 & 2(21): jurisdiction of school tribunal whether a school run by cantonment board is not a recognised school within the meaning of section 2(21)? - held, the act is enacted to regulate recruitments and conditions of employees in certain private schools and provisions of the act shall apply to all private schools in the state whether receiving any grant-in-aid from the state government or not. private school is defined in section 2(2) of the act as a recognised school established or administered by a management other than the government or a local authority. recognised means.....george knox, j.1. while i think that in every case, whether under section 195 or section 476 of the code of criminal procedure, the particular statement when the offence refers to a statement, should be set out so that the accused person should not be taken by surprise, but should clearly know what is the statement which he is required to meet, i am not prepared to hold that the non-specification of the statement is a material irregularity. the law does not, so far as i can find out, require that the statement should be set out, and in the present case there can be no room for doubt what is the statement which the accused person has to meet. i dismiss the application with costs.