Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sharma Roadlines Vs. C.S.T.

Sharma Roadlines vs C.S.T.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Feb 09, 2007
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/44799

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sharma Roadlines

Respondent

C.S.T.

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)9STJ203CESTATNew(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. the applications are directed against service tax demand made against the appellant and penalties imposed. the impugned order has held that the appellant was rendering the service of c&f agent to m/s.eil.3. the contention of the appellant is that it was transporting fly ash from ntpc's power plant (where they accumulated) to the asbestos plant of m/s. eil and that service has been incorrectly adjudged as clearing and forwarding service. m/s. eternit industries ltd. kymore (subsequently known as m/s. everest industries ltd. and hereinafter referred to as the e.i.l.) is a part of acc group of companies and is engaged in manufacture of asbestos sheets having production units at kymore (mp), kolkata, lakhmapur (nashik district) and padanur (near coimbatore). they appointed transportation agents for supply of fly ash. some of its c&f agents were also functioning as the suppliers of fly ash, which is a waste material generated by power plants and was supplied free of cost. these c&f/transportation agents lifted fly ash from various thermal power plants on behalf of m/s. eil, packed it in gunny bags and after proper storage made arrangements for its transportation to the units of m/s. eil.coal handlers pvt.ltd. v. cce, kolkata 2006 (3) s.t.r. 286 the tribunal held the coal handling agent to be a clearing and forwarding agent.6. from the record (and the finding), we are of the opinion that the appellant is essentially rendering the service of transportation. the decision in the case of coal handlers pvt. ltd.(supra) may not be attracted to the present case.7. in the result, the stay applications are allowed and recoveries stayed till the disposal of the appeals.

Full Judgment

1. The applications are directed against service tax demand made against the appellant and penalties imposed. The impugned order has held that the appellant was rendering the service of C&F Agent to M/s.

EIL.

3. The contention of the appellant is that it was transporting fly ash from NTPC's power plant (where they accumulated) to the asbestos plant of M/s. EIL and that service has been incorrectly adjudged as clearing and forwarding service.

M/s. Eternit Industries Ltd. Kymore (subsequently known as M/s.

Everest Industries Ltd. and hereinafter referred to as the E.I.L.) is a part of ACC Group of companies and is engaged in manufacture of Asbestos Sheets having production units at Kymore (MP), Kolkata, Lakhmapur (Nashik District) and Padanur (near Coimbatore). They appointed transportation agents for supply of fly ash. Some of its C&F agents were also functioning as the suppliers of fly ash, which is a waste material generated by power plants and was supplied free of cost. These C&F/transportation agents lifted fly ash from various thermal power plants on behalf of M/s. EIL, packed it in gunny bags and after proper storage made arrangements for its transportation to the units of M/s. EIL.Coal Handlers Pvt.

Ltd. v. CCE, Kolkata 2006 (3) S.T.R. 286 the Tribunal held the coal handling agent to be a Clearing and Forwarding agent.

6. From the record (and the finding), we are of the opinion that the appellant is essentially rendering the service of transportation. The decision in the case of Coal Handlers Pvt. Ltd.(supra) may not be attracted to the present case.

7. In the result, the stay applications are allowed and recoveries stayed till the disposal of the appeals.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial