Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Alayar Khan Vs. Emperor

Alayar Khan vs Emperor

Type Court Judgment Court Allahabad Decided Aug 27, 1929
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/447959

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Allahabad
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. CJ, P.V. Hardas, Naresh H. Patil, R.M. Borde & R.M. Savant, JJ] Jurisdiction of School Tribunal Constituted under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Alayar Khan

Respondent

Emperor

Legal References

Reported In
AIR1930All23

Excerpt

.....schools (conditions of service) regulations act, 1978 [act no. 3/1978]. sections 9 & 2(21): jurisdiction of school tribunal whether a school run by cantonment board is not a recognised school within the meaning of section 2(21)? - held, the act is enacted to regulate recruitments and conditions of employees in certain private schools and provisions of the act shall apply to all private schools in the state whether receiving any grant-in-aid from the state government or not. private school is defined in section 2(2) of the act as a recognised school established or administered by a management other than the government or a local authority. recognised means recognised by director, the divisional board or state board. thus as far as the first part of the definition of being recognised is concerned, it includes, as stated above, four directors, the divisional boards and four state boards. the second part of this definition which comes after the comma refers to any officer authorised by director or by any of such boards. the question to be examined is whether school run by the cantonment board could be said to be one run by any such boards. a private school has to be recognised by the state or the divisional board or by any officer authorised in that behalf. when this phrase namely: recognised by any officer authorised by the director or by any such boards, is included in the latter part of section 2(21), such boards will be of the level of the state board or the divisional board. the boards referred to in the definition of the word recognised means the boards which deal with education at levels other than that of the level at which primary schools are operating. thus for being recognised, the school has to be recognised by the board and therefore, it has to be operating at a higher level i.e., secondary level. section 2(21) of the act defines the term recognised. the last clause therein is by any of such boards. the term such is defined in oxford dictionary as..........in communal matters, he was not prepared to reduce the security. alayar khan has applied for revision to this court.2. alayar khan is a man of considerable influence at konch and is a member of the municipal board. the township of konch is torn by factions. the necessary consequence is political differences and communal dissensions.3. notice was issued to him to show cause as to why he should not be bound over inasmuch as:(1) he habitually cheats, commits extortion and counterfeits coins and currency notes:(2) he habitually commits and abets the commission of offences involving a breach of the peace:(3) he is so desparate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security hazardous to the community.4. forty-eight witnesses were examined before the trial court to prove these allegations. the applicant appears to have been convicted under sections 147, 149 and 325, i.p.c. on 26th august 1915 and sentenced to term of imprisonment which was reduced in appeal by the high court. he was also bound over under section 107, criminal p.c. on 9th march 1928, he was bound over for one year under section 107, criminal p.c. the trial court in an elaborate judgment, consisting of 70 type-written pages arrived at the conclusion that alayar khan habitually commits cheating and extortion; habitually commits and attempts to commit, and abets the commission of offences involving a breach of the peace specially in connexion with religious riots and is so desparate and dangerous that his being at large without security is hazardous to the community. the learned sessions judge on appeal held that the evidence of general repute was not sufficient to establish the charge relating to cheating and extortion as no specific acts had been proved. he maintained the finding and the order of the court below on the other counts.5. the learned sessions judge observed as follows:my opinion, after carefully examining the evidence on the record, is that the evidence of general repute given.....

Full Judgment

Sen, J.

1. On 18th March 1929, Mr. Browne, the learned District Magistrate of Jalaun, directed that Alayar Khan, the applicant, should under Section 110, Criminal P.C. execute a bond for Rs. 2,000 with two sureties in Rs. 2,000 each to be of good behaviour for a term of one year. He appealed to the learned Sessions Judge who set aside the finding of the trial Court so far as it related to the charge under Section 110(d) but maintained the findings in other respects. The learned Sessions Judge observed that in view of the dangerous activities of the appellant in communal matters, he was not prepared to reduce the security. Alayar Khan has applied for revision to this Court.

2. Alayar Khan is a man of considerable influence at Konch and is a member of the Municipal Board. The township of Konch is torn by factions. The necessary consequence is political differences and communal dissensions.

3. Notice was issued to him to show cause as to why he should not be bound over inasmuch as:

(1) he habitually cheats, commits extortion and counterfeits coins and currency notes:

(2) he habitually commits and abets the commission of offences involving a breach of the peace:

(3) he is so desparate and dangerous as to render his being at large without security hazardous to the community.

4. Forty-eight witnesses were examined before the trial Court to prove these allegations. The applicant appears to have been convicted under Sections 147, 149 and 325, I.P.C. on 26th August 1915 and sentenced to term of imprisonment which was reduced in appeal by the High Court. He was also bound over under Section 107, Criminal P.C. On 9th March 1928, he was bound over for one year under Section 107, Criminal P.C. The trial Court in an elaborate judgment, consisting of 70 type-written pages arrived at the conclusion that Alayar Khan habitually commits cheating and extortion; habitually commits and attempts to commit, and abets the commission of offences involving a breach of the peace specially in connexion with religious riots and is so desparate and dangerous that his being at large without security is hazardous to the community. The learned Sessions Judge on appeal held that the evidence of general repute was not sufficient to establish the charge relating to cheating and extortion as no specific acts had been proved. He maintained the finding and the order of the Court below on the other counts.

5. The learned Sessions Judge observed as follows:

My opinion, after carefully examining the evidence on the record, is that the evidence of general repute given by the witnesses for the prosecution, taken in combination with the specific instances proved, establishes that Alayar Khan is a fomentor of communal discord and that he likes to excite trouble and create bad blood. The fomenting of communal trouble amounts to an abetment of offences calculated to involve a breach of the peace. My impression from the evidence is that Alayar Khan is a firebrand of a dangerous type. A man who stirs up communal enmity and who does and says things which must inevitably create such enmity is clearly an instigator and thus an abettor of offences involving a breach of the peace. A man of this character is a danger to society and should undoubtedly be made to give security.

6. This Court has considerable hesitation in going into the merits of a case under Section 110, Criminal P. C, unless the Court below in dealing with the evidence has made a material departure from legal principles. I have been referred to the evidence on the record and have considered the criticisms of the learned Counsel for the applicant. I do not think that the Court below has erred in admitting evidence which ought to have been excluded or in ignoring evidence which might have told in favour of the accused. Where both the parties have tendered evidence, the question of weight is not a question of law.

7. The applicant has been carrying on his game amongst people whose passions and prejudices are easily roused and who are driven to lawlessness by his sinister influence. He is a menace to the community to which he belongs and to the social order generally.

8. Section 110, Criminal P. C, is intended to put a curb upon the activities of persons who set the ball of discord in motion and try to create or foment dissensions between man and man or between one community and another in matters which result in or have a tendency to result in breach of the peace. Alayar Khan deserved to be dealt with a strong hand; Accepting the finding of the Court below, I hold that the order passed against the applicant was fully justified. I reject the application.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial