Status Polymers Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Status Polymers vs Commissioner of Customs and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jan 25, 2007

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/44677

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/44677
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: A Wadhwa, V T M.
Decided On: Jan 25, 2007
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Status Polymers

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs and

Legal References

Reported In: (2007)9STJ105CESTAT(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. the application is for restoration of the appeal dismissed earlier vide order no. a/1217/wzb/2006/cstb dated 31/10/2006 for non-compliance with the directions to deposit an amount of rs. 1 lakh. it is the appellants' case that the deposit was made well within the time granted by the stay order and the report was submitted with the registry. it seems that the said report was not placed before the bench.2. in view of the above, we restore the appeal to its original number and allow the miscellaneous application.

Full Judgment

1. The application is for restoration of the appeal dismissed earlier vide order No. A/1217/WZB/2006/CSTB dated 31/10/2006 for non-compliance with the directions to deposit an amount of Rs. 1 lakh. It is the appellants' case that the deposit was made well within the time granted by the stay order and the report was submitted with the registry. It seems that the said report was not placed before the bench.

2. In view of the above, we restore the appeal to its original number and allow the Miscellaneous Application.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Status Polymers vs Commissioner of Customs and Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge A Wadhwa, V T M.