Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Dora Plastics (Pvt.) Ltd.

State of Andhra Pradesh vs Dora Plastics (Pvt.) Ltd.

Disposition Revision dismissed Court Andhra Pradesh Decided Jan 31, 2006
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/438246

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tax Revision Case No. 2 of 2006
Subject
Sales Tax
Disposition
Revision dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Sales Tax
Outcome / disposition
Revision dismissed
Acts & sections
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Andhra Pradesh

Advocate Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes

Respondent

Dora Plastics (Pvt.) Ltd.

Legal References

Acts
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957
Reported In
[2006]147STC683(AP)

Excerpt

- orderbilal nazki, j.1. this revision has been filed against an order passed by the sales tax appellate tribunal. the controversy before the tribunal was whether plastic cups and tumblers would fall within entry no. 19 of the first schedule to the andhra pradesh general sales tax act, 1957 (for short 'the act') or would fall within entry no. 187 of the first schedule to the act. in the tribunal's view, these items were basically containers and as such, they would fall within entry 19 of the first schedule to the act. the tribunal relied on a judgment of the supreme court reported in g. claridge & company ltd. v. collector of central excise : 1991ecr433(sc) by which the supreme court held that egg trays fall within the meaning of expression of 'container'. in this view of the matter, we do not think there is any scope for revising the order passed by the tribunal.2. the tax revision case is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Bilal Nazki, J.

1. This revision has been filed against an order passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The controversy before the Tribunal was whether plastic cups and tumblers would fall within entry No. 19 of the First Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short 'the Act') or would fall within entry No. 187 of the First Schedule to the Act. In the Tribunal's view, these items were basically containers and as such, they would fall within entry 19 of the First Schedule to the Act. The Tribunal relied on a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in G. Claridge & Company Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise : 1991ECR433(SC) by which the Supreme Court held that egg trays fall within the meaning of expression of 'container'. In this view of the matter, we do not think there is any scope for revising the order passed by the Tribunal.

2. The tax revision case is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial