Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Ses Technology Ltd.

Commissioner of Customs vs Ses Technology Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Oct 06, 2006
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/43816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Customs

Respondent

Ses Technology Ltd.

Excerpt

1. we have heard both sides on the appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the commissioner (appeals) airport extending the benefit of exemption from payment of cvd on cooling fans and heat sinks imported along with microprocessor in terms of notification no.6/2002-c.e.2. we find that the commissioner (appeals) has relied upon the literature produced to hold that the cooling fans and heat sinks are integral part of microprocessor. he also holds that the cooling fans and heat sinks are fully integrated with the micro processor and packed as one composite unit. both micro processor as well as cooling fan have been classified by the original authority under the tariff heading 84733010 of the cta. in these circumstances, the revenue's contention that the benefit of the notification is not available is not tenable for the reason that as per the s. no. 261a of the table to the notification, micro processor of computers other than mother boards, floppy disc drive, hard disc drive and cd-rom drive falling there under chapter heading 84.71 or 84.73 of the cta are eligible for exemption, and the goods in question are parts of micro processor for computers other than mother boards. we, therefore, held that the commissioner (appeals) has rightly extended the benefit of the notification and accordingly upheld the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Full Judgment

1. We have heard both sides on the appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) Airport extending the benefit of exemption from payment of CVD on cooling fans and heat sinks imported along with microprocessor in terms of notification No.6/2002-C.E.2. We find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has relied upon the literature produced to hold that the cooling fans and heat sinks are integral part of microprocessor. He also holds that the cooling fans and heat sinks are fully integrated with the micro processor and packed as one composite unit. Both micro processor as well as cooling fan have been classified by the original authority under the tariff heading 84733010 of the CTA. In these circumstances, the Revenue's contention that the benefit of the notification is not available is not tenable for the reason that as per the S. No. 261A of the table to the notification, micro processor of computers other than mother boards, floppy disc drive, hard disc drive and CD-ROM drive falling there under chapter heading 84.71 or 84.73 of the CTA are eligible for exemption, and the goods in question are parts of micro processor for computers other than mother boards. We, therefore, held that the Commissioner (Appeals) has rightly extended the benefit of the notification and accordingly upheld the impugned order and reject the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial