Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Graphite (i) Ltd.

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Graphite (i) Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Oct 04, 2006
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/43797

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Respondent

Graphite (i) Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)(212)ELT54Tri(Mum.)bai

Excerpt

1. this is revenue's appeal against the order of the commissioner (appeals), vide which modvat credit has been held to be admissible on the ground that the cash memos issued by hpcl, which is a public sector undertaking, are proper documents for the purpose of modvat rules for arriving at the above conclusion, the appellant authority has relied upon a number of decisions of the tribunal including the one reported in 2004 (65) rlt 260 (cestat - del).2. as against the above, the revenue's contention in their memo of appeal is that cash memos cannot be treated as proper documents for availment of modvat credit as held by the tribunal in the case of universal chemicals industries pvt ltd., v. cce, mumbai reported in 2004 (177) e.l.t. 726 (tri. - mumbai). however, 1 find that the appellate authority has observed that these cash memos were containing debit entries. however, there is no dispute about receipt of inputs, duty paid on the same and utilization of the inputs in the manufacture of the final products. it is now well settled by catena of judgements that hyper technicalities should not be made the basis in disallowing the modvat credit. reliance by appellate authority on various decisions of the tribunal is while appropriated, as such i find no merits in the revenue's appeal and reject the same.

Full Judgment

1. This is revenue's appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), vide which modvat credit has been held to be admissible on the ground that the cash memos issued by HPCL, which is a public sector undertaking, are proper documents for the purpose of modvat rules for arriving at the above conclusion, the appellant authority has relied upon a number of decisions of the Tribunal including the one reported in 2004 (65) RLT 260 (CESTAT - Del).

2. As against the above, the revenue's contention in their memo of appeal is that cash memos cannot be treated as proper documents for availment of modvat credit as held by the Tribunal in the case of Universal Chemicals Industries Pvt Ltd., v. CCE, Mumbai reported in 2004 (177) E.L.T. 726 (Tri. - Mumbai). However, 1 find that the appellate authority has observed that these cash memos were containing debit entries. However, there is no dispute about receipt of inputs, duty paid on the same and utilization of the inputs in the manufacture of the final products. It is now well settled by catena of judgements that hyper technicalities should not be made the basis in disallowing the modvat credit. Reliance by appellate authority on various decisions of the Tribunal is while appropriated, as such I find no merits in the revenue's appeal and reject the same.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial