Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anant Technocrats P. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Anant Technocrats P. Ltd. vs Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jul 28, 2006
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/43261

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anant Technocrats P. Ltd.

Respondent

Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.

Excerpt

2. the service tax levied on the appellant amounting to rs. 4,05,000/-along with interest has been discharged and only an amount of rs. 20,295/-stands outstanding now required to be deposited. the penalty imposed by the original authority has been deposited in full.the commissioner (appeals) as a review authority enhanced the penalty from rs. 20,000/- to rs. 12 lakhs under sections 76 and 78 of the finance act, 1994.3. since major part of the service tax was discharged even before the show cause notice was issued, the enhancement of the amount can be ordered to be waived as pre-deposit required under section 35f of the central excise act, 1944 as made applicable to service tax matters and order stay of recovery thereof pending regular hearing of the appeal.

Full Judgment

2. The Service tax levied on the appellant amounting to Rs. 4,05,000/-along with interest has been discharged and only an amount of Rs. 20,295/-stands outstanding now required to be deposited. The penalty imposed by the original authority has been deposited in full.

The Commissioner (Appeals) as a review authority enhanced the penalty from Rs. 20,000/- to Rs. 12 lakhs Under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

3. Since major part of the Service Tax was discharged even before the show cause notice was issued, the enhancement of the amount can be ordered to be waived as pre-deposit required Under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to Service Tax matters and order stay of recovery thereof pending regular hearing of the appeal.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial