Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bio Campus Vs. Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Bio Campus vs Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Decided Jun 28, 2006
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/42989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bio Campus

Respondent

Commissioner of Cus. and C. Ex.

Legal References

Reported In
(2007)7STT290

Excerpt

.....this specialized software, which is widely used for research purposes in the fields of bio-chemistry, pharmacy and related inter-disciplinary fields, would not come under this heading. they refer to the licence obtained by them for imparting the training of software under the field mentioned and hence they contest the entry. the learned counsel submits that the benefit of notification no. 9/2003 available for computer training would be attracted in the present case and no liability would arise.2. the learned sdr contests the issue and contends that this activity would not come under computer training, as the software is not meant for giving the computer training but specialized courses in the fields of bio-chemistry, pharmacy and related inter-disciplinary fields which, on no stretch of imagination, can be treated as computer training. he submits that they rightly come in the category in which the department has confirmed the service tax.3. on a careful consideration, we notice that the issue pertaining to the matter has to be gone into in great detail in the light of the literature and other material produced by the appellants. at this stage, it cannot be said prima facie that the training imparted by them would be for computer training alone, as even in terms of their own admission, they are carrying out specialized courses meant for graduates and post-graduates in the fields of biotechnology, pharmacy and other related inter-disciplinary fields. however, to enable the appellants to contest the matter, they are directed to pre-deposit a sum of rs. 1,00,000/-(rupees one lakh only) within a period of two months from today. on such deposit, the balance of the service tax and penalty stands waived and recovery stayed. call on to report compliance on 31st august, 2006.

Full Judgment

1. The appellants are required to pre-deposit Rs. 7,40,200/- being the service tax demanded under the category of 'Commercial Training or Coaching Services'. The appellants have contested for bringing their activity of imparting Specialized Software Training within the ambit of this category. They contend that this specialized software, which is widely used for research purposes in the fields of Bio-Chemistry, Pharmacy and related inter-disciplinary fields, would not come under this heading. They refer to the licence obtained by them for imparting the training of software under the field mentioned and hence they contest the entry. The learned Counsel submits that the benefit of Notification No. 9/2003 available for Computer Training would be attracted in the present case and no liability would arise.

2. The learned SDR contests the issue and contends that this activity would not come under Computer Training, as the software is not meant for giving the Computer Training but specialized courses in the fields of Bio-Chemistry, Pharmacy and related inter-disciplinary fields which, on no stretch of imagination, can be treated as computer training. He submits that they rightly come in the category in which the department has confirmed the service tax.

3. On a careful consideration, we notice that the issue pertaining to the matter has to be gone into in great detail in the light of the literature and other material produced by the appellants. At this stage, it cannot be said prima facie that the training imparted by them would be for Computer Training alone, as even in terms of their own admission, they are carrying out specialized courses meant for graduates and post-graduates in the fields of biotechnology, pharmacy and other related inter-disciplinary fields. However, to enable the appellants to contest the matter, they are directed to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-(Rupees One lakh only) within a period of two months from today. On such deposit, the balance of the service tax and penalty stands waived and recovery stayed. Call on to report compliance on 31st August, 2006.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial