Just Marble Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court Judgment Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Jun 09, 2006

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/42851
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: R Abichandani, S T T.V.
Decided On: Jun 09, 2006

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Just Marble

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Excerpt

1. merely because the applicant is having registered office and residence of the partner at mumbai, it is not a good ground for transferring the appeal to cestat, mumbai. the appeal is required to be heard by the concerned zonal bench of the cestat under whose jurisdiction the commissionerate passing the order is located.

Full Judgment

1. Merely because the applicant is having registered office and residence of the partner at Mumbai, it is not a good ground for transferring the appeal to CESTAT, Mumbai. The appeal is required to be heard by the concerned Zonal Bench of the CESTAT under whose jurisdiction the Commissionerate passing the Order is located.

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

Full Judgment

Stay Ahead. Stay Focused.