Just Marble Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Just Marble vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Jun 09, 2006

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/42851

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/42851
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: R Abichandani, S T T.V.
Decided On: Jun 09, 2006
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Just Marble

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Excerpt

1. merely because the applicant is having registered office and residence of the partner at mumbai, it is not a good ground for transferring the appeal to cestat, mumbai. the appeal is required to be heard by the concerned zonal bench of the cestat under whose jurisdiction the commissionerate passing the order is located.

Full Judgment

1. Merely because the applicant is having registered office and residence of the partner at Mumbai, it is not a good ground for transferring the appeal to CESTAT, Mumbai. The appeal is required to be heard by the concerned Zonal Bench of the CESTAT under whose jurisdiction the Commissionerate passing the Order is located.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Just Marble vs Commissioner of Customs Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge R Abichandani, S T T.V.