Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Vikash Traders and anr.

State of Andhra Pradesh vs Vikash Traders and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Andhra Pradesh Decided Apr 19, 1989
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/427778

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Tax Revision Case Nos. 62 and 63 of 1989
Subject
Sales Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- - 2. The tax revision cases accordingly fail and they are dismissed.

Key legal issue
Sales Tax
Acts & sections
Andhra pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7(1) and 38; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(3)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

State of Andhra Pradesh

Advocate The Government Pleader for ;C.T.

Respondent

Vikash Traders and anr.

Legal References

Acts
Andhra pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 7(1) and 38; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 5(3)
Reported In
[1990]78STC269(AP)

Excerpt

- - 2. the tax revision cases accordingly fail and they are dismissed.jeevan reddy, j.1. in these tax revision cases, we are concerned with groundnut, which is taxable at the last purchase point under the andhra pradesh general sales tax act, 1957. the assessees herein, the dealers, sold groundnut to exporters, who purchased the same within the state and exported it. the question is who is the last purchaser evidently the exporter is the last purchaser in the state. but that purchase is getting exempted from tax by virtue of section 5(3) of the central sales tax act and section 38 of the andhra pradesh general sales tax act. on this score the department is seeking to tax the dealer (who sold the groundnut to the exporter) as the last purchaser. evidently this is not correct as a fact. just because the last purchase is getting exempted by virtue of section 5(3) of the central sales tax act, it would not be permissible in law to shift the point of last purchase to the dealer, who sold the groundnut to the exporter. we may also mention that explanation to section 7(b) added by the amendment act 18 of 1985 with effect from july 1, 1985, is not applicable to the assessment year in question in these tax revision cases. 2. the tax revision cases accordingly fail and they are dismissed. advocate's fee rs. 150 in each. 3. petition dismissed.

Full Judgment

Jeevan Reddy, J.

1. In these tax revision cases, we are concerned with groundnut, which is taxable at the last purchase point under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The assessees herein, the dealers, sold groundnut to exporters, who purchased the same within the State and exported it. The question is who is the last purchaser Evidently the exporter is the last purchaser in the State. But that purchase is getting exempted from tax by virtue of section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act and section 38 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act. On this score the department is seeking to tax the dealer (who sold the groundnut to the exporter) as the last purchaser. Evidently this is not correct as a fact. Just because the last purchase is getting exempted by virtue of section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, it would not be permissible in law to shift the point of last purchase to the dealer, who sold the groundnut to the exporter. We may also mention that explanation to section 7(b) added by the Amendment Act 18 of 1985 with effect from July 1, 1985, is not applicable to the assessment year in question in these tax revision cases.

2. The tax revision cases accordingly fail and they are dismissed. Advocate's fee Rs. 150 in each.

3. Petition dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial