Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Makers Laboratories Ltd. and

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Makers Laboratories Ltd. and

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Dec 28, 2005
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/41307

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of Central Excise

Respondent

Makers Laboratories Ltd. and

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. the department's appeal in appeal no. e/2557/04 is against the lower appellate authority's order confirming refund amounting to rs. 5,39,687/-. m/s makers laboratories ltd.'s appeal no.e/2048/05 is against the lower appellate authority's order confirming recovery of the very same amount of rs. 5,39,687/-. as such, both the orders are contradictory relating to the same issue and the same amount in question. therefore, with the consent of both sides, both the impugned orders are set aside and the appeals are remanded to the commissioner (appeals) to re-decide the matter and pass a single order after hearing both sides. the appeals are allowed by way of remand.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides. The department's appeal in Appeal No. E/2557/04 is against the lower appellate authority's order confirming refund amounting to Rs. 5,39,687/-. M/s Makers Laboratories Ltd.'s Appeal No.E/2048/05 is against the lower appellate authority's order confirming recovery of the very same amount of Rs. 5,39,687/-. As such, both the orders are contradictory relating to the same issue and the same amount in question. Therefore, with the consent of both sides, both the impugned orders are set aside and the appeals are remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) to re-decide the matter and pass a single order after hearing both sides. The appeals are allowed by way of remand.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial